On 3/5/2020 3:11 PM, Elvis Stansvik wrote:
Den tors 5 mars 2020 kl 19:26 skrev Max Paperno <ma...@wdg.us>:
One thing for sure, since my benchmarks, from here on I will very much
prefer the "multiArg" version of .arg() vs. using multiple .arg()s.
Closing side note: There's a a nice Clazy diagnostic for that.
Indeed, but IIRC it only warns when using multiple strings, like
.arg("string").arg("other"), not with, for example
.arg("string").arg(5). Whereas it's still considerably faster (and I
presume more "efficient") to do .arg("string", QString::fromNumber(5)).
Even just a single .arg(QString::fromNumber(5)) seems a little faster
than .arg(5).
Best,
-Max
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
