Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

I would like to ask to you stop spreading this misinformed and misleading content. There are two commercial products for Qt, Qt for Application Development and Qt for Device Creation. Creating a mobile or desktop app (Qt AD) does _not_ ask for runtimes for royalties. If you have any further qu

Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

Do the royalties apply for desktop and mobile applications too? If I am right, the royalties do apply for only embedded devices. The royalties are paid by buying Qt for Device Creation Distribution Licenses. On 7 August 2018 at 06:57, Roland Hughes wrote: > > > On 08/06/2018 05:36 PM, ekke wro

Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

So, their demo is old. They aren't going to sit there and update it each time. It didn't look odd to me. I spent several years coding like that when Qt believed in multiple inheritance, then they wanted to reach out to the dying language of Java . . . Perhaps you weren't around during the Tro

Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

On 08/06/2018 05:36 PM, ekke wrote: this is frustrating: knowing that Qt is great for mobile apps, but there's a license cost barriere Don't forget about the royalties when you start offering things for sale. -- Roland Hughes, President Logikal Solutions (630)-205-1593 http://www.theminimumy

Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 23:46, Sylvain Pointeau > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 3:44 PM ekke wrote: > >> > >> > >> I'm really waiting for a 30 EUR or so Indiependent Dev License. > >> > >> I know from discussions that in the p

Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 23:46, Sylvain Pointeau wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 3:44 PM ekke wrote: >> >> >> I'm really waiting for a 30 EUR or so Indiependent Dev License. >> >> I know from discussions that in the past there already was such kind of >> license with less success. >> >> But in

Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 3:44 PM ekke wrote: > Am 04.08.18 um 19:23 schrieb Sylvain Pointeau: > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 at 12:58, René Hansen wrote: > >> >> Taxing big corporate use, while exempting smalltime adoption, even >> commercial, might be the way to go. This is just speculation on my part >

Re: [Interest] Drawing a background image in QTreeWidget [SOLVED]

Solved it.  Drawing in the viewport's rectangle instead of the event's keeps the background image properly positioned and updated when selections change: void SeatTree::paintEvent(QPaintEvent *event) {     // draw in the viewport rectangle coordinates instead of the     // event's

Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

Am 04.08.18 um 19:23 schrieb Sylvain Pointeau: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 at 12:58, René Hansen > wrote: > > > Taxing big corporate use, while exempting smalltime adoption, even > commercial, might be the way to go. This is just speculation on my > part though, I ha

Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

I feel your pain. Let us not forget there is a __HUGE__ section of the industry which has a severe ethical problem with someone taking an OpenSource product, adding a tiny few things then trying to both license the __same__ product __and__ collect royalties in perpetuity. Those who fail to l