So, their demo is old. They aren't going to sit there and update it each
time. It didn't look odd to me. I spent several years coding like that
when Qt believed in multiple inheritance, then they wanted to reach out
to the dying language of Java . . . Perhaps you weren't around during
the Trolltech days?
You should also be aware that the version of U++ they did that with is
extremely outdated. It's kind of like those Qt wiki pages which sit
around for a decade or more. Especially the ones for cross compiling to
Raspberry Pi which don't tell you they used a 32-bit host system to hide
all of the errors. That was great fun.
On 08/06/2018 04:19 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 08:01:32AM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote:
Even embedded systems have started moving away from Qt due to due to
marketing always trying to force a license on people whether they need it or
not.
U++ is getting attention. https://www.ultimatepp.org
[...]
https://www.ultimatepp.org/www$uppweb$comparison$en-us.html
"To compare Ultimate++ with Qt (R), we decided to reimplement Qt
demonstration example "AddressBook". On the left side is U++ code,
on the right side original Qt example."
"Qt and the Qt logo are trademarks of Trolltech in Norway,
the United States and other countries."
"ABMainWindow::ABMainWindow()
: QMainWindow( 0, "example addressbook application" ),
filename( QString::null )"
In case this already looks odd to you, you may stop reading here.
Andre'
PS: Spoiler:
What is *not* shown there is the line
" ** Copyright (C) 1992-2008 Trolltech ASA. "
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us/
http://onedollarcontentstore.com
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest