Re: [Interest] Odd Proxy Behavior

2016-11-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 20:06:35 PST Jason Kretzer wrote: > Thanks Thiago. > === > Why this if? Why not always tell it to use the system configuration? > === > > If there was a proxy detected should I not try to use it? Or does the line > below just automatically use whatever is se

Re: [Interest] Odd Proxy Behavior

2016-11-29 Thread Jason Kretzer
Thanks Thiago. === Why this if? Why not always tell it to use the system configuration? === If there was a proxy detected should I not try to use it? Or does the line below just automatically use whatever is set in "Internet Options"? QNetworkProxyFactory::setUseSystemConfiguration(true); Not c

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.7.1 release date ?

2016-11-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 23:42:55 PST qt next wrote: > Hi, > > is there a date for the release 5.7.1 ? As usual, "when it's ready". We'll know the date for sure when we see the release announcement that it's been released. The release team plans for a given date, but if we find pr

Re: [Interest] QRC URL normalization

2016-11-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 14:33:34 PST Jérôme Godbout wrote: > Not sure, but normal url would be > > protocol://path > like http://www.qt.io > > : is the protocol splitter delimiter > > // is annoncing the path follow That's not correct. A URL is: scheme:hierarchy [?query]

Re: [Interest] Odd Proxy Behavior

2016-11-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 09:34:32 PST Jason Kretzer wrote: > if(listOfProxies.size() > 0) { > QNetworkProxy::setApplicationProxy(listOfProxies[0]); > } else { > QNetworkProxyFactory::setUseSystemConfiguration(true); > } Why this if? Why not always tell it

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 17:51:28 PST Jake Petroules wrote: > See, this is why we need to make submissions on JIRA require signing the > CLA. People simply don't want to go through the Gerrit hassle for drive-by > contributions. I'm not sure we should accept drive-by contributions in

[Interest] Qt 5.7.1 release date ?

2016-11-29 Thread qt next
Hi, is there a date for the release 5.7.1 ? ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] QRC URL normalization

2016-11-29 Thread Jérôme Godbout
Not sure, but normal url would be protocol://path like http://www.qt.io : is the protocol splitter delimiter // is annoncing the path follow so based on that, qrc is the protocol, you would need the :// after then the path, since it's a path like a filesystem, it start with / again, making the t

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Murphy, Sean
> > On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 09:00:21 PST Andy wrote: > >> So I would suggest reporting the bug at https://bugreports.qt.io and > >> attaching the fixes - then at least it exists somewhere and can be > >> found/looked at/integrated by someone in the future. > > > > We cannot accept pa

[Interest] QRC URL normalization

2016-11-29 Thread Pendleton, Corey
Hey all, The following bug report has been open for a while: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-40859 The premise is that doing dynamic creation of QML objects using a URL results in type incompatible errors if you use the form "qrc:/" for your URL. If you instead use the form "qrc:///" this

Re: [Interest] QLineEdit::editingFinshied()

2016-11-29 Thread André Pönitz
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:55:11PM +0100, André Somers wrote: > > > Op 29/11/2016 om 15:53 schreef Duane: > >On 29/11/2016 9:16 AM, Duane wrote: > >>On 29/11/2016 8:54 AM, Robert Buchinger wrote: > > > >Putting a breakpoint in the code was causing the focusOut to fire when the > >slot was hit due

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Jake Petroules
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:27 AM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 09:00:21 PST Andy wrote: >> So I would suggest reporting the bug at https://bugreports.qt.io and >> attaching the fixes - then at least it exists somewhere and can be >> found/looked at/integrated

[Interest] Odd Proxy Behavior

2016-11-29 Thread Jason Kretzer
Typically, this code just works. Ever since implementing it, I have had no issues at all when putting a device behind a network proxy — both HttpProxy and HttpCachingProxy. Unfortunately, it is not working for a particular HttpProxy. Here is the code: qDebug() << "Detecting Proxy Settings

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 09:00:21 PST Andy wrote: > So I would suggest reporting the bug at https://bugreports.qt.io and > attaching the fixes - then at least it exists somewhere and can be > found/looked at/integrated by someone in the future. We cannot accept patches on the bugrepo

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 13:42:39 PST Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > Hello, > > We use Qt under LGPL license. > > We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited > connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. > > What do we must to do next to obey th

Re: [Interest] Qt containers deprecated with 5.0?

2016-11-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 09:43:56 PST Burak Arslan wrote: > On 11/28/16 12:54, André Somers wrote: > > there is nothing wrong with using std containers in a Qt application, > > Aren't qt-branded containers emit-friendly? AFAIK the meaty bits are > refcounted which makes it a non-issu

Re: [Interest] SCXML editor in QtCreator

2016-11-29 Thread Ulf Hermann
Hello Wolf, Thanks for trying the SCXML editor. Your feedback is appreciated. I have tried out the SCXML editor plugin for the QtCreator. My first impression is very positive. The editor creates nicely looking state chart diagrams. There are only two downsides I have found so far: 1. Events ar

Re: [Interest] QQuickPaintedItem vs QML Canvas

2016-11-29 Thread Philip Schuchardt
I would recommend using QQuickPaintedItem. It'll probably take you less time to port your code. I've found QML canvas a bit hard to debug since it's all in javascript. It's really easy to miss spell an object's variable name and rendering won't work. I've also found it to be more buggy than a QQuic

[Interest] Qml Object prototype generate errors

2016-11-29 Thread Jérôme Godbout
Hi, We are on Qt 5.5.1 and we try to add javascript Object prototype like this .pragma library Object.prototype.values = function(o) { return Object.keys(o || {}).map(function(i){ return o[i]; }); } We want to add the ECMA-2017 features, remove it when available into the JS engine: https://dev

[Interest] QQuickPaintedItem vs QML Canvas

2016-11-29 Thread Ian Geiser
I have a 2D bullet graph done in QWidgets, but I would like to use it in QML. I am wondering if it is better to do the component as a QQuickPaintedItem or to just do it in the QML canvas API. Are there any key differences in performance between the two?

Re: [Interest] QLineEdit::editingFinshied()

2016-11-29 Thread André Somers
Op 29/11/2016 om 15:53 schreef Duane: On 29/11/2016 9:16 AM, Duane wrote: On 29/11/2016 8:54 AM, Robert Buchinger wrote: Putting a breakpoint in the code was causing the focusOut to fire when the slot was hit due to a return press. But when I triggered the slot by forcing a loss of focus,

Re: [Interest] QLineEdit::editingFinshied()

2016-11-29 Thread Duane
On 29/11/2016 9:16 AM, Duane wrote: On 29/11/2016 8:54 AM, Robert Buchinger wrote: Putting a breakpoint in the code was causing the focusOut to fire when the slot was hit due to a return press. But when I triggered the slot by forcing a loss of focus, it of course didn't fire again. Doh.

Re: [Interest] Qt containers deprecated with 5.0?

2016-11-29 Thread Bob Hood
On 11/28/2016 11:43 PM, Burak Arslan wrote: On 11/28/16 12:54, André Somers wrote: there is nothing wrong with using std containers in a Qt application, Aren't qt-branded containers emit-friendly? AFAIK the meaty bits are refcounted which makes it a non-issue to pass them around from signals to

Re: [Interest] QLineEdit::editingFinshied()

2016-11-29 Thread Duane
On 29/11/2016 8:54 AM, Robert Buchinger wrote: On Dienstag, 29. November 2016 08:48:11 CET Duane wrote: Qt 5.7 - MinGW 5.3.0 - Windows 7 When pressing the enter key, editingFinished() fires twice. When the line edit loses scope it works correctly. Is this a known bug? Is there a workaround?

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
29.11.2016, 17:00, "Andy" : > Back to Alexander's question... > > Should he choose to contribute the fixes back, signing up for, setting up, > and working with gerritt is a PIA if you aren't using it frequently. Doing initial setup is really easy if you follow instruction. Working with Gerrit d

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Andy
Back to Alexander's question... Should he choose to contribute the fixes back, signing up for, setting up, and working with gerritt is a PIA if you aren't using it frequently. So I would suggest reporting the bug at https://bugreports.qt.io and attaching the fixes - then at least it exists somewh

Re: [Interest] QLineEdit::editingFinshied()

2016-11-29 Thread Robert Buchinger
On Dienstag, 29. November 2016 08:48:11 CET Duane wrote: > Qt 5.7 - MinGW 5.3.0 - Windows 7 > > When pressing the enter key, editingFinished() fires twice. When the > line edit loses scope it works correctly. Is this a known bug? Is > there a workaround? > > > ___

[Interest] QLineEdit::editingFinshied()

2016-11-29 Thread Duane
Qt 5.7 - MinGW 5.3.0 - Windows 7 When pressing the enter key, editingFinished() fires twice. When the line edit loses scope it works correctly. Is this a known bug? Is there a workaround? ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http:/

[Interest] full screen desktop app without any desktop manager in Linux

2016-11-29 Thread Francisco Ares
Hi, I'm still using Qt 4.8.6 in an embedded solution, using Linux and Xorg server. Nowadays, I'm feeling the pressure to move to recent versions of Qt 5 due to all new and pretty interesting stuff. This app must fill all video monitor area, despite its resolution and format. And as an embedded s

Re: [Interest] [Qt3D] Color map material

2016-11-29 Thread Philip Schuchardt
That seems like a reasonable approach. I've done something similar but in pure OpenGL. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:10 AM Juan Jose Casafranca wrote: > That's nice. > My implementation is agnostic on the colors that should be available in > the material. It uses a ColorMap object where the user def

Re: [Interest] [Qt3D] Color map material

2016-11-29 Thread Juan Jose Casafranca
That's nice. My implementation is agnostic on the colors that should be available in the material. It uses a ColorMap object where the user defines the stop value (between 0 and 1) and the color value for that stop. Using that information it creates a texture that will be accesed in the shader via

Re: [Interest] [Qt3D] Color map material

2016-11-29 Thread Philip Schuchardt
I think it would also be nice to have some sorta color brewer. Here are some examples of reasonable color brewers. Depending on your data, brewer usually supports three types of color mappings: sequential, divergent, and categorical. Here are some helpful links http://colorbrewer2.org/ http://mkwe

[Interest] SCXML editor in QtCreator

2016-11-29 Thread Bublitz, Wolf
Hallo, I have tried out the SCXML editor plugin for the QtCreator. My first impression is very positive. The editor creates nicely looking state chart diagrams. There are only two downsides I have found so far: 1. Events are currently not visible in the diagram. 2. As far as I see

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
29.11.2016, 14:57, "André Somers" : > Op 29/11/2016 om 12:01 schreef Konstantin Tokarev: >>  29.11.2016, 13:51, "André Somers" : >>>  Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev:    Hello,    We use Qt under LGPL license.    We have found some problem in it (bug wor

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread André Somers
Op 29/11/2016 om 12:01 schreef Konstantin Tokarev: 29.11.2016, 13:51, "André Somers" : Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev: Hello, We use Qt under LGPL license. We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited connection speed) and fixed it. We have

[Interest] [Qt3D] Color map material

2016-11-29 Thread Juan Jose Casafranca
Hi, I've been working on a material for Qt3D for showing temperature like maps usually used in scientific visualization. Would you be interested in adding it to the extras library? Cheers ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
29.11.2016, 13:45, "Jake Petroules" : >>  On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: >> >>  Hello, >> >>  We use Qt under LGPL license. >> >>  We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited >> connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. >> >>  Wh

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
29.11.2016, 13:51, "André Somers" : > Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev: >>  Hello, >> >>  We use Qt under LGPL license. >> >>  We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited >>  connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. >> >>  What do we mus

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread André Somers
Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev: Hello, We use Qt under LGPL license. We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. What do we must to do next to obey the license terms? Publish the changes

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Gian Maxera
> On 29 Nov 2016, at 10:45, Jake Petroules wrote: > > >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> We use Qt under LGPL license. >> >> We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited >> connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Q

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Jake Petroules
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > > Hello, > > We use Qt under LGPL license. > > We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited > connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. > > What do we must to do next to obey the license terms

[Interest] License regarding question

2016-11-29 Thread Alexander Dyagilev
Hello, We use Qt under LGPL license. We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. What do we must to do next to obey the license terms? Publish the changes somewhere? _