> On 29 Nov 2016, at 10:45, Jake Petroules <jake.petrou...@qt.io> wrote: > > >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Alexander Dyagilev <alervd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> We use Qt under LGPL license. >> >> We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited >> connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. >> >> What do we must to do next to obey the license terms? >> >> Publish the changes somewhere? > > Yes, you should publish the changes to Qt code review so that we can > integrate the fix back into Qt. > > https://wiki.qt.io/Contribute
I think that is not mandatory under LGPL license. Of course, it would be a nice to do because all the community can benefit from your work. But from a formal point of view, I don’t think you are enforced to do so. The only thing your are enforced to do is to release the fix under LGPL license too. That means you cannot sell under commercial terms your fixed-Qt version, instead you have to give for free to anyone would ask to you. > >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > -- > Jake Petroules - jake.petrou...@qt.io > The Qt Company - Silicon Valley > Qbs build tool evangelist - qbs.io > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
