Hello,
Does Qt plan to move Multimedia on Linux to GStreamer 1.0?
Thank you.
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
> In years prior it was not uncommon to find major corporations with teams
> of 40+ developers, many of them consultants, developing systems for
> internal consumption. Large projects took (and still take) a minimum of
> 7 years to spec, develop, test, install and finally settle in. During
> th
Ok thanks, i fixed it by my self.
Best Regards
Andreas
Von: Interest
[mailto:interest-bounces+andreas.klos=izfp.fraunhofer...@qt-project.org] Im
Auftrag von Klos, Andreas
Gesendet: 18 October 2016 13:57
An: interest@qt-project.org
Betreff: [Interest] Qt3D texture from memory (QImage)
Dear grea
Am 18.10.2016 um 13:41 schrieb Viktor Engelmann:
I'm not even on board for TDD, because tests don't help you against
interlocking-issues, data races, etc. and are only of limited use
against many others like dangling pointers, subsequent memory
corruption, UI freezing, etc.
This is a really int
On 10/18/2016 07:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
It's hard to
know when you're really done because you don't really have metrics to tell
you--or the customer--when the project/is/ done.
Per the 1985 accounting rules change, if you have a definition of "done"
you cannot book the
On 10/18/2016 07:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
I'm not even on board for TDD, because tests don't help you against
interlocking-issues, data races, etc. and are only of limited use
against many others like dangling pointers, subsequent memory
corruption, UI freezing, etc.
Tests ca
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Viktor Engelmann
wrote:
>
> A key part in that article: *"A complex back-end data services hub — a
> piece of software with zero actual, living, breathing end-users — has to be
> described in terms of “user” stories. Does something sound off-key to you?
> It shoul
Am 18.10.2016 um 12:31 schrieb Roland Hughes:
> https://gcn.com/blogs/reality-check/2013/11/healthcare-agile.aspx
>
> Contrary to your opinion, Healthcare.gov is a shining example of the
> faster-cheaper-splat that is Agile.
A key part in that article: /"A complex back-end data services hub — a
p
On 10/17/2016 10:30 AM, Jason H wrote:
On 10/04/2016 06:31 PM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
Similarly Healthcare.gov started off not Agile and ended Agile.
Clearly, the problem isn't the methodology, it is your application of
it.
You know, I can forgive most of the dis-information
