Am 18.10.2016 um 12:31 schrieb Roland Hughes: > https://gcn.com/blogs/reality-check/2013/11/healthcare-agile.aspx > > Contrary to your opinion, Healthcare.gov is a shining example of the > faster-cheaper-splat that is Agile.
A key part in that article: /"A complex back-end data services hub — a piece of software with zero actual, living, breathing end-users — has to be described in terms of “user” stories. Does something sound off-key to you? It should, because user stories are great for user interfaces but poor, confusing and often misconstrued for non-observable behavior." / That's precisely what I said earlier - Agile is good for front-ends, but not for back-ends. I'm not even on board for TDD, because tests don't help you against interlocking-issues, data races, etc. and are only of limited use against many others like dangling pointers, subsequent memory corruption, UI freezing, etc. Tests can only prove the existence of bugs, not the absence (Linus Torvalds doesn't even use debuggers, for the same reason) At the end of the day, you need competent developers for complex tasks - no programming language, no framework, no SDLC will ever change that. Viktor -- Viktor Engelmann Software Engineer The Qt Company GmbH Rudower Chaussee 13 D-12489 Berlin viktor.engelm...@qt.io +49 151 26784521 http://qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
