Oh, I replied immediately when I saw the question, haven’t read other answers
which I should’ve read before I send to the list.
Sorry for that, Guido and the list.
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/lis
How does it help? I know the new syntax very well. I was interested in an
implementation detail. If there are advantages/disadvantages (speed/size)
besides the obvious, e.g. compile time tests. Or if there is a difference if or
if not the slots macros are used even though the function pointer ap
This official post may help http://qt-project.org/wiki/New_Signal_Slot_Syntax
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
On Monday March 09 2015 12:12:38 Adam Light wrote:
Thanks Adam,
> We use the following configure command with a Git checkout of the 5.4
> branch to build 32-bit Qt builds without problems:
> MAKEFLAGS=-j16 ../../qt/configure -confirm-license -debug-and-release
> -opensource -gui -widgets -qpa coc
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:14 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following up on the earlier discussion of 32bit Qt builds.
> Is it possible to do a 32bit Qt build on a 64bit system? I just tried to
> build Qt 5.4.1 using `configure -platform macx-clang-32`. I did get a 32bit
> qmake executable, but th
On Monday March 09 2015 08:49:12 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > That almost looks like the `-arch i386` option (set for all compiler FLAGS
> > in macx-clang-32/qmake.conf) is actually used only when compiling ObjC
> > code.
> You might be right.
I think I *was* right :) but also that the culprit was
On Monday 09 March 2015 14:14:36 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following up on the earlier discussion of 32bit Qt builds.
> Is it possible to do a 32bit Qt build on a 64bit system? I just tried to
> build Qt 5.4.1 using `configure -platform macx-clang-32`. I did get a 32bit
> qmake executable,
Hi Denis,
Yes, you can get your old nick in use.
It is reserved for the email you used on qt-project.org.
So when you create an account with the same email as on qt-project.org, you can
set the nick to be the one you used on qt-project.org. That will bring your
points with you (divided by ten,
Hi all.
I have some questions:
1. It is possible to drag my account (nick-name) from the old
http://qt-project.org/ forum?
Because when I tried to use an old nick, then it says that a nick
already is in use.
2. It is possible to drag the my points? Because now I neew to starts
all fron the be
Hi,
Following up on the earlier discussion of 32bit Qt builds.
Is it possible to do a 32bit Qt build on a 64bit system? I just tried to build
Qt 5.4.1 using `configure -platform macx-clang-32`. I did get a 32bit qmake
executable, but the build already failed on creating libQt5Bootstrap.a :
.obj
> -Original Message-
> From: interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
> [mailto:interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Ferguson, Eric W (397B)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:04 PM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Interest
> And if that doesn't raise warnings on 10.7+ that is probably because one way
> or another ARC is used?
No, this is because the framework is different.
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/inter
First, thanks for the information.
I don't really see the proposed work around. Because you cannot actually
call any QT function based on OpenGL < 3.0 anymore without letting the
application crash (e.g. renderText in QGLWindow) , when selecting a 4.1
context (only under mac osx). But I agree th
Hi,
I am trying to install the installer framework on a 64 bit windows machine
running Windows 7 and running into problem. I began by statically building QT
on windows using the configuring specified in the README in the installer
framework's repo, which seemed to work fine. Next, I ran qmake f
14 matches
Mail list logo
