Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread tosi
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Stefano Tabacchiera wrote: >> Hi all, >> my box is running cyrus-2.1.11 and I set up quota for my users. >> When someone is overquota, it's impossible to MOVE messages to Trash >> and then delete them. The only way is to NOT use Trash, mark messages >> a

Re: [Annoyed] Cyrus-imapd/sasl upgrade and lmtpd behaviour...

2003-01-02 Thread Ian G Batten
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Scott Smith wrote: > group and put cyrus and MTA user in it. Or, you can run LMTP over TCP (keep > it on loopback) with SASL. I must confess that as a general rule I've given up on using AF_UNIX sockets now that we're all aware that running all daemons as root is A Bad Idea.

Sendmail local mailer still needed ?

2003-01-02 Thread marc . bigler
Hello, I wanted to know if the local mailer of sendmail -> MAILER(`local') directive in the Sendmail mc file is still needed when using Cyrus ? I would say no as the LDA is now all done by Cyrus but I had a look in the mailer/local.m4 file of Sendmail and saw quite a lot of stuff in it so I am no

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Scott Russell
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step > > operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and then > > deleted from the source directory. The copy operation fails > > because the user is

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread tosi
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step >> operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and >> then deleted from the source directory. The copy operation fails >> > because the user

Re: Sendmail local mailer still needed ?

2003-01-02 Thread John A. Tamplin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I wanted to know if the local mailer of sendmail -> MAILER(`local') directive in the Sendmail mc file is still needed when using Cyrus ? I would say no as the LDA is now all done by Cyrus but I had a look in the mailer/local.m4 file of Sendmail and saw quite a lo

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread twk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and then deleted from the source directory. The copy operation fails bec

Re: Sendmail local mailer still needed ?

2003-01-02 Thread Gary Mills
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 09:01:47AM -0500, John A. Tamplin wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >I wanted to know if the local mailer of sendmail -> MAILER(`local') > >directive in the Sendmail mc file is still needed when using Cyrus ? > > > The documentation says there must always be a local ma

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There is no 'move' command in the IMAP RFC iirc. A 'move' operation is > > just client side semantics for 'copy and then delete'. > > > > True. Dumb me :-) > > Perhaps it should be implemented ? :) This has been discussed on the IMAP list before, an

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Dave O
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Scott Russell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step > > > operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and then > > > deleted from the source directo

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Dave O wrote: > > There is no 'move' command in the IMAP RFC iirc. A 'move' operation is > > just client side semantics for 'copy and then delete'. > > Then why not use the hard links (essentially the same as SIS delivery) for > IMAP copy? Well, for one, IMAP commands don't ha

Cyrus-imapd2 with Cyrus-sasl2 with IMAP login/authenticate

2003-01-02 Thread Martin Y. Chiu
Dear all, After reading some document and tracing some code of imapd2 and sasl, I found that cyrus-imapd2 use the different authentication method with IMAP 'LOING' and 'AUTHENTICATE' command. LOGIN uses sasl_checkpass() and AUTHENTICATE uses sasl_server_start() and sasl_s

Re: Cyrus-imapd2 with Cyrus-sasl2 with IMAP login/authenticate

2003-01-02 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Martin Y. Chiu wrote: > After reading some document and tracing some code of imapd2 and > sasl, I found that cyrus-imapd2 use the different authentication > method with IMAP 'LOING' and 'AUTHENTICATE' command. LOGIN uses > sasl_checkpass() and AUTHENTICATE u

Re: Sendmail local mailer still needed ?

2003-01-02 Thread marc . bigler
>The documentation says there must always be a local mailer, but you >don't have to use it. Ie, in your .mc file you will have >MAILER(`local'), MAILER(`cyrusv2'), and >define(`confLOCAL_MAILER',`cyrusv2') (plus whatever else you need). Thanks for your answer... Now what I don't really understa

Re: restoring from backup individual messages/folders

2003-01-02 Thread Scott Russell
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:08:50PM +0100, Hein Roehrig wrote: > Hi *, > > I would be interested in what kind of services&strategies admins here > offer to users regarding restoring accidentally deleted (&expunged) > messages. We make it clear that we're not responsible for user stup^W mistakes. N

Re: restoring from backup individual messages/folders

2003-01-02 Thread Dave McMurtrie
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Hein Roehrig wrote: > I would be interested in what kind of services&strategies admins here > offer to users regarding restoring accidentally deleted (&expunged) > messages. > > In particular, while it is relatively safe to backup a running Cyrus > and in the case of desaster r

Problems with authentication

2003-01-02 Thread Michael Obster
Hi, thx for the people who showed me the good documentation ;-) Ok. I have now tracked the problem a little bit. root@gutmann:/usr/lib# imtest -m login -a cyrus localhost S: * OK gutmann Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.11 server ready C: C01 CAPABILITY S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 ACL QUOTA LITERAL+ MAILBOX

Re: Problems with authentication

2003-01-02 Thread David Chait
Michael, Did you remember to create the symbolic link between /usr/local/sasl2 and /usr/sasl2 ? - Original Message - From: "Michael Obster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:24 PM Subject: Problems with authentication > Hi, > > thx for the

Re: Problems with authentication

2003-01-02 Thread John A. Tamplin
Michael Obster wrote: Hi, thx for the people who showed me the good documentation ;-) Ok. I have now tracked the problem a little bit. root@gutmann:/usr/lib# imtest -m login -a cyrus localhost S: * OK gutmann Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.11 server ready C: C01 CAPABILITY S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 AC

Re: Problems with authentication

2003-01-02 Thread Scott Smith
I think you mean `/usr/local/lib/sasl2' and `/usr/lib/sasl2' Scott David Chait wrote: Michael, Did you remember to create the symbolic link between /usr/local/sasl2 and /usr/sasl2 ? - Original Message - From: "Michael Obster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday

Re: Problems with authentication

2003-01-02 Thread Ken Murchison
"John A. Tamplin" wrote: > > Michael Obster wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >thx for the people who showed me the good documentation ;-) > > > >Ok. I have now tracked the problem a little bit. > > > >root@gutmann:/usr/lib# imtest -m login -a cyrus localhost > >S: * OK gutmann Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.11 server r

Re: Problems with authentication

2003-01-02 Thread Ken Murchison
David Chait wrote: > > Michael, > Did you remember to create the symbolic link between /usr/local/sasl2 > and /usr/sasl2 ? Try again, imapd already sees the plugins (look at the CAPABILITY response). > - Original Message - > From: "Michael Obster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL

Re: Problems with authentication

2003-01-02 Thread simon . brady
Michael Obster wrote: >S: L01 NO Login failed: generic failure >Authentication failed. generic failure >Security strength factor: 0 Are you logging cyrus (local6.debug) and SASL (auth.debug)? If so, what do they say? -- Simon Brady mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ITS Techni