Re: LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-14 Thread Cillian Sharkey
Randall S. Winchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RFC2033 is only 7 pages of which the first 5 are of interest, and is > fairly light reading as RFC's go. You should take a look; > http://www.imc.org/rfc2033 I just looked at the RFC - and it is suprisingly short. I'll read it in more detail late

Re: LMTP vs SMTP

2000-12-14 Thread Ørnulf Nielsen
>> LMTP will send the message only once to cyrus and allow cyrus to deliver the >> message internally to the list of recipients provided during the LMTP >> exchange with sendmail. One nice feature that this provides to cyrus is >> single-message store, where the message is stored in the first reci

Re: SUMMARY (Well, sort of): Authentication against MySQL Database

2000-12-14 Thread Tim Evans
>Shouldn't this be passwd=bar instead of password=bar ? > >Tim Evans wrote: > >> >> #%PAM-1.0 >> authoptional/lib/security/pam_mysql.so user=foo password=bar >> db=healthhub table=auth usercolumn=username passwdcolumn=password crypt=1 >> account required/lib/security/pam_mysql.

Cyrus IMAPd Capacity Planning

2000-12-14 Thread Stefano Santoro
Hi, I am not looking for scientific numbers, but I would like to get an estimate of how many concurrent cyrus imapd connection I can achieve with a dual 800 Mhz PIII, 1GB, 20GB+ storage on 80MB+ SCSI linux server. Thnx Stefano

Re: Cluster solution for mailserver

2000-12-14 Thread Michael Fair
Why not use the Cyrus Murder? http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/ag.html If you need full redundancy, then this combined with some kind of failover system should make it the most scalable and robust architecure I've seen yet. -- Michael -- - Original Message - From: "Rainer Enders" <[EMAIL

Re: Cluster solution for mailserver

2000-12-14 Thread Amos Gouaux
It's not available yet, is it? -Amos > On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:31:00 -0800, > Michael Fair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (mf) writes: mf> Why not use the Cyrus Murder? mf> http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/ag.html

Re: Cluster solution for mailserver

2000-12-14 Thread Ken Murchison
All of the code is there and functional (I know that Larry has it running, because he tested some changes that I made for him), but there isn't any documentation on how to set it up yet. Other than setting up an ACAP server, and tweaking cyrus.conf to run proxyd and acappush, I don't know what el

Re: release date of 2.0.8? (was: Version recommendation & Docs request)

2000-12-14 Thread Walter Wong
Walter Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 2.0.7 is pretty stable. The CVS version fixes a couple of little bugs. If > > does anybody know when to expect the release of 2.0.8 (or whatever it > will be)? Very soon (probably within a week). If anyone is holding on to any patches, now would b

Re: Cluster solution for mailserver

2000-12-14 Thread Walter Wong
Amos Gouaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not available yet, is it? I'm sure it won't come as a shock that it is available and functional but we are lagging behind on documentation. As a side note, we're going to be putting into production the aggregator with the 2.x codebase at the end of

Re: Cyrus IMAPd Capacity Planning

2000-12-14 Thread Walter Wong
Stefano Santoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not looking for scientific numbers, but I would like > to get an estimate of how many concurrent cyrus imapd > connection I can achieve with a dual 800 Mhz PIII, 1GB, > 20GB+ storage on 80MB+ SCSI linux server. Anywhere from 1000-3000 imapds. De