Re: sasl_pwcheck_method

2009-06-09 Thread Greg A. Woods
At Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:19:49 +0200, li...@oliver-block.eu wrote: Subject: Re: Re: sasl_pwcheck_method > > Dan White schrieb: > > When authenticating via CRAM-MD5, the pwcheck_method will be ignored. > > Your chosen pwcheck_method should only be referenced when > > au

Re: Re: sasl_pwcheck_method

2009-06-08 Thread lists
Dan White schrieb: > When authenticating via CRAM-MD5, the pwcheck_method will be ignored. > Your chosen pwcheck_method should only be referenced when > authenticating > via a 'plaintext' authentication mechanism - LOGIN or PLAIN. Good to know. I must have omitted this part of the manual.:-

Re: sasl_pwcheck_method

2009-06-08 Thread Dan White
li...@oliver-block.eu wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > I configured cyrus imapd on a Opensuse 11 machine following the > recommedation in a README file. Now I discovered the following - for > me odd behavior - which might depend on a "misconfiguration". > > /et

sasl_pwcheck_method

2009-06-08 Thread lists
Hello everybody, I configured cyrus imapd on a Opensuse 11 machine following the recommedation in a README file. Now I discovered the following - for me odd behavior - which might depend on a "misconfiguration". /etc/imap.conf: sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd /etc/sysconfig

Re: sasl_pwcheck_method: alwaystrue

2002-11-13 Thread Rob Siemborski
It's not removed, its just not compiled in by default. You need to compile sasl with --enable-alwaystrue -Rob On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I can't remember who but someone told me that there was an option for > sasl_pwcheck_method called

sasl_pwcheck_method: alwaystrue

2002-11-13 Thread marc . bigler
Hello, I can't remember who but someone told me that there was an option for sasl_pwcheck_method called alwaystrue which would bypass the user's password, now I have tryed that but it looks like this doesn't exist as I can't see anything mentioning that and when I try it I s

sasl_pwcheck_method: auxprop

2002-09-30 Thread Carlos Velasco
Hi, I have just upgraded to latest CVS SASL and IMAPD (2.2 branch). Now, when I try to authenticate through cyradm or pop3 or imap using sasl_pwcheck_method: auxprop in imapd.conf, I can not authenticate and I get this into auth log: Sep 30 11:12:34 auth:debug imap: imap[32561]: could not

sasl_pwcheck_method: auxprop ? [it works, but ...]

2002-05-23 Thread Ema Nymton
I did find my problem ... on my debian (It is a special installation, from 2.2r3 install-cd but with sources.list from the testing branch) I had to make a link in /usr/lib to /usr/local/lib/sasl2 ... and now it is working !!! But, BUT, I have new problems :-) I have a "permission denied" to creat

sasl_pwcheck_method option not working

2002-05-23 Thread hendrik
Hi, I'm running Debian sid and installed the cyrus21-imapd packages. It seems to run fine using sasldb2. But when I change sasl_pwcheck_method to pam or saslauthd nothing happens. Cyrus still authenticates using the sasldb2 file. Saslauthd (with -a pam) is running and works (accordi

sasl_pwcheck_method: auxprop ?

2002-05-23 Thread Ema Nymton
/var/spool/imap admins: root cyrus sasl_pwcheck_method: auxprop Now I run the master process, and I try an `imtest` and I have an authentication failed : in /var/log/imapd.log imapd[15180]: badlogin: localhost[127.0.0.1] plaintext cyrus SASL(-13): user not found: checkpass failed in /var/log

Re: Is sasl_pwcheck_method: PAM broken on Solaris

2001-03-17 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
is what I've > configured: > > imap was buit with: > --with-auth=unix > > SASL was built with: > --with-pam=/usr/lib/security > > /etc/imapd.conf: > sasl_pwcheck_method: PAM > > /etc/pam.conf > imap auth required /usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so.1 debug &g

Is sasl_pwcheck_method: PAM broken on Solaris

2001-03-15 Thread Rob Tanner
unix SASL was built with: --with-pam=/usr/lib/security /etc/imapd.conf: sasl_pwcheck_method: PAM /etc/pam.conf imapauth required /usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so.1 debug In pam.conf, wondering if I needed the account management function as well, I also added and then later removed (since it