hink I am doing what you are saying, since I have both email
addresses in the addresses section, or are you saying there is someplace
else that forwarded addresses should go?
thanks,
maria
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:47:50 +0200
> From: Michael Menge
> Subject: Re: sieve p
a vacation response.
~maria
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:45:26 -0400
From: Joseph Brennan
Subject: Re: sieve problem with vacation filter again.
To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Message-ID: <47d6211e92001626abbc9...@sodor.cc.columbia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; forma
Re: sieve problem with vacation filter again.
> To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> Message-ID: <47d6211e92001626abbc9...@sodor.cc.columbia.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
>
> Maria McKinley wrote:
>
>> The only thing unusual a
Maria McKinley wrote:
> The only thing unusual about this account, that I can think of, is that
> he is forwarding mail to this account from other accounts.
Did you put those other addresses in the sieve rule?
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
Cyrus Home Page: h
Maria McKinley wrote:
> I had managed to get the vacation filter working for the user that was
> having problems by getting rid of the database and playing around with
> the filter forever, but it seems that the fix was only temporary. Other
> filters still work fine, and vacation filters for ot
I had managed to get the vacation filter working for the user that was
having problems by getting rid of the database and playing around with
the filter forever, but it seems that the fix was only temporary. Other
filters still work fine, and vacation filters for other users work fine.
Of cou
Fixed in CVS.
Thanks,
Ken
John Holman wrote:
>
> Just to say that this is also a problem for us. Our email addresses are
> case insensitive, and I can be mailed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any other combination. Users complain about having
> to put their mail address into th
Hello,
i remember using the standard vacation and also procmail for these
purposes. I guess that the main reason, why lmtpd needs information about
the recipient, is to avoid that vacation messages are sent to mailing
lists. And then it seems very unlikely to me, that a users mail address
differs
At 19:30 14/01/02, Gary Mills wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:35:49PM +, John Holman wrote:
> >
> > In fact, even when the local part of addresses is case sensitive, I think
> > it would be better to do a case insensitive match for purposes of deciding
> > eligibility for a vacation message
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:35:49PM +, John Holman wrote:
>
> In fact, even when the local part of addresses is case sensitive, I think
> it would be better to do a case insensitive match for purposes of deciding
> eligibility for a vacation message. After all, if the message is delivered
>
Just to say that this is also a problem for us. Our email addresses are
case insensitive, and I can be mailed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or any other combination. Users complain about having
to put their mail address into the vacation facility at all - and are not
at all happy a
Hello,
i am still fighting with vacation. As far as i understand the source
code, and what i read in the archives, the envelope address and the
strings in the :addresses field are compared to To, Cc and Bcc fields.
If they match, a vacation message may be sent.
My sendmail configuration, which is
Hi all,
as posted before i have a problem with sieve-vacation. I read lots of
documents, but still found no solution. Here are some more details:
I am using cyrus-imap 2.0.16 with sendmail 8.11.3 on a SuSE Linux 7.2. We
are doing LDAP based mailrouting here, using OpenLDAP. I created a sieve
scr
Hello,
i have a problem with vacation. I have to use the :addresses parameter
and it seems, that this parameter is case sensitive, which does not make
sense to me. Any ideas or solutions?
Olaf Dreyer
14 matches
Mail list logo
