plus-addressing to mailbox with special-use

2019-11-28 Thread Javier Angulo
Hello all, I would like to have spam messages delivered to special-use \Junk folder. As for my tests, this is possible using plus-addressing + the 'anyone p' permission on Junk + special-use "\Junk" attribute set on Junk mailbox; but in our setup, the special-use attribute &q

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-12-15 Thread Alain Spineux
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Stefan Pampel antispam wrote: > Alain Spineux schrieb am 11.12.2008 08:15: > >> I dont see nothing wrong in your main.cf >> Can you post your master.cf ? > > ok, here is the master.cf I dont see anything vrong, ask your question to the postfix mailing list ! > >

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-12-12 Thread Stefan Pampel antispam
Alain Spineux schrieb am 11.12.2008 08:15: > I dont see nothing wrong in your main.cf > Can you post your master.cf ? ok, here is the master.cf thx, and bye Stefan # # Postfix master process configuration file. For details on the format # of the file, see the master(5) manual page (command: "

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-12-10 Thread Alain Spineux
_subdomains= > > #disable_dns_lookups = yes > > virtual_transport=lmtp:unix:/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp > virtual_alias_domains = > virtual_mailbox_domains = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-virtual_mailbox_domains.cf > virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-virtual_mailbox_maps.cf

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-12-10 Thread Stefan Pampel antispam
ticated smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_auth_destination,reject_unauth_destination content_filter = amavisfeed:127.0.0.1:10024 >> Does it mean amavis and postfix use LMTP protocol ? This is unusual ! &

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-12-03 Thread Lan Tran
- Original Message - From: "Alain Spineux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 2:03 AM Subject: Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set >I made multiple comments , look carefully > &

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-12-02 Thread Alain Spineux
el >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> it seems that plus addressing not work in my case: >>> >>> postfix configured correctly: >>> main.cf: >>> recipient_delimiter = + >>> >>> master.cf: >>> lmtp unix - - n

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-12-02 Thread Duncan Gibb
Stefan Pampel wrote: >>> Mails basically reach the INBOX, but not the folder itself I think this is an MTA problem, rather than a Cyrus problem. > Received: from foo.org ([127.0.0.1]) > by localhost (foo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) > with LMTP id ggSVa5nIr8Oq for <[EMA

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-12-02 Thread Stefan Pampel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Pampel ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> it seems that plus addressing not work in my case: >> >> postfix configured correctly

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-12-01 Thread Alain Spineux
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Pampel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > it seems that plus addressing not work in my case: > > postfix configured correctly: > main.cf: > recipient_delimiter

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-11-27 Thread Stefan Pampel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Quoting Stefan Pampel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> it seems that plus addressing not work in my case: >> >> postfix configured correctly: >> main.cf: >> recipient_del

Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-11-27 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Quoting Stefan Pampel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > it seems that plus addressing not work in my case: > > postfix configured correctly: > main.cf: > recipient_delimiter = + > > mast

plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set

2008-11-27 Thread Stefan Pampel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, it seems that plus addressing not work in my case: postfix configured correctly: main.cf: recipient_delimiter = + master.cf: lmtp unix - - n - - lmtp Mails basically reach the INBOX, but not the folder

subfolder delivery with plus addressing, lmtp

2007-05-14 Thread Ross Boylan
I am delivering mail into subfolders with plus addressing, using lmtp over Unix domain sockets. I discovered that in order to do this I needed to, e.g. (in cyradm) setacl INBOX.comp anyone p (from a message by Phil Pennock on exim-users 2006-04-22). Otherwise they end up in the main INBOX. I

Re: interaction of plus addressing and sieve

2006-09-05 Thread Kjetil Torgrim Homme
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 21:55 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > Does the use of plus addressing (user+folder.subfolder) bypass sieve? > If not, how do they interact, for example if sieve specifies > deliveries to locations other than folder.subfolder? it only changes the default folder for

interaction of plus addressing and sieve

2006-09-04 Thread Ross Boylan
Does the use of plus addressing (user+folder.subfolder) bypass sieve? If not, how do they interact, for example if sieve specifies deliveries to locations other than folder.subfolder? Ross Boylan Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu

Re: plus addressing to a mailbox with a space in its name

2006-04-05 Thread Robert Mueller
Has anyone had success with using plus addressing to send to a specific mail folder when the folder name has a space in it? With cyrus 2.3 you can enable: lmtp_fuzzy_mailbox_match: 1 From imapd.conf lmtp_fuzzy_mailbox_match: 0 If enabled, and the mailbox specified in the

plus addressing to a mailbox with a space in its name

2006-04-05 Thread Jon Rowell
I want to be able to use plus addressing to send email directly to a user's mailbox. Here's an example: jondoe+test [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where 'test mailbox' (with a space and without the quotes) is a mail folder in jondoe's inbox. I've tried several var

Re: plus addressing with postfix

2006-03-17 Thread David R Bosso
--On Friday, March 17, 2006 11:57 AM -0500 Steve Huston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 03/17/2006 11:51 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote: Stefano Santoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... and if you plan to deliver to subfolders DO make sure that the subfolder names are all lowercase. INBOX.junk not INBO

Re: plus addressing with postfix

2006-03-17 Thread Steve Huston
On 03/17/2006 11:51 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote: > Stefano Santoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ... and if you plan to deliver to subfolders DO make sure that the >> subfolder names are all lowercase. >> INBOX.junk not INBOX.Junk > What makes this necessary? I would guess that's only true if you hav

RE: plus addressing with postfix

2006-03-17 Thread Stefano Santoro
Kwok >> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:21 AM >> To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu >> Subject: plus addressing with postfix >> >> Hi, >> >> How can I make cyrus imap plus delivery work from postfix. >> I have virtual domains. >> >> in my mas

RE: plus addressing with postfix

2006-03-17 Thread Joseph Brennan
Stefano Santoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... and if you plan to deliver to subfolders DO make sure that the subfolder names are all lowercase. INBOX.junk not INBOX.Junk What makes this necessary? Joseph Brennan Columbia University Information Technology Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.w

RE: plus addressing with postfix

2006-03-17 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
ailto:info-cyrus- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Kwok > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:21 AM > To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu > Subject: plus addressing with postfix > > Hi, > > How can I make cyrus imap plus delivery work from postfix. > I have virtual domai

plus addressing with postfix

2006-03-17 Thread Steve Kwok
Hi, How can I make cyrus imap plus delivery work from postfix. I have virtual domains. in my master.cf cyrus unix- n n - - pipe user=cyrus argv=/usr/lib/cyrus/deliver -r ${sender} -m ${extension} ${recipient} I use autocreateinbox patch to cr

Re: autocreate folder for plus addressing?

2006-01-18 Thread Ken Murchison
Ondrej Sury wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:42 -0500, Scott Russell wrote: Greets. With Cyrus 2.3.1 (or the auto create patches?) can folders automatically be created for plus addressing? I was toying with the idea of having tagged spam being sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than using a

Re: autocreate folder for plus addressing?

2006-01-18 Thread Scott Russell
Ondrej Sury wrote: I guess it's simpler to patch your create scripts (or create some automated modify scripts) to create this folder for each user then patch cyrus source code for this task. You can also revoke users permissions to delete that mailbox - just use: sam folder -user c (didn't try

Re: autocreate folder for plus addressing?

2006-01-18 Thread Ondrej Sury
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:42 -0500, Scott Russell wrote: > Greets. > > With Cyrus 2.3.1 (or the auto create patches?) can folders automatically > be created for plus addressing? > > I was toying with the idea of having tagged spam being sent to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] rath

Re: autocreate folder for plus addressing?

2006-01-17 Thread Christos Soulios
. Regards, Christos Scott Russell wrote: > Greets. > > With Cyrus 2.3.1 (or the auto create patches?) can folders automatically > be created for plus addressing? > > I was toying with the idea of having tagged spam being sent to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than using a sieve sc

autocreate folder for plus addressing?

2006-01-17 Thread Scott Russell
Greets. With Cyrus 2.3.1 (or the auto create patches?) can folders automatically be created for plus addressing? I was toying with the idea of having tagged spam being sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than using a sieve script. Since sieve scripts are user editable using plus addressing to

Re: plus addressing

2005-09-22 Thread Zachariah Mully
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 18:54 -0700, Huaqing Zheng wrote: > On 9/21/05, Zachariah Mully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all- > > I'm in the process of moving from a qmail/uw-imap installation to a > > postfix/Cyrus-2.2 and I've one last problem to solve before I can start > > moving peop

Re: plus addressing

2005-09-21 Thread Huaqing Zheng
On 9/21/05, Zachariah Mully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all- > I'm in the process of moving from a qmail/uw-imap installation to a > postfix/Cyrus-2.2 and I've one last problem to solve before I can start > moving people onto the new system. > We make heavy use of qmail's ext

plus addressing

2005-09-21 Thread Zachariah Mully
Hello all- I'm in the process of moving from a qmail/uw-imap installation to a postfix/Cyrus-2.2 and I've one last problem to solve before I can start moving people onto the new system. We make heavy use of qmail's extension addressing, which uses a dash as the default delimiter. In

Plus addressing with exim and lmtp socket

2004-08-02 Thread Kevin Moschallski
Hi, I use cyrus-imapd with exim. I deliver the mail from exim using the lmtpd unix socket. All mails arrive fine but even when i try to send a mail to a sub folder directly it ends in the users INBOX. I set the ACLs to the users mailboxes to cyrus all and anyone p. But the mails do end in the user

Re: Plus Addressing (ORA book)

2003-12-17 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Wander wrote: > Actually I´m still using version 1.6.24. Ok people, I know it´s completely out > of date, but kind of internal problems... This chapter certainly will be > useful also if something different from "anonymous p" or even "anyone p" can > be said, since this was th

Re: Plus Addressing (ORA book)

2003-12-16 Thread Wander
Thanks Pollywog, Actually I´m still using version 1.6.24. Ok people, I know it´s completely out of date, but kind of internal problems... This chapter certainly will be useful also if something different from "anonymous p" or even "anyone p" can be said, since this was the first thing I did. Th

Re: Plus Addressing (ORA book)

2003-12-16 Thread Pollywog
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:46:21 -0500 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, a lot of this book (w.r.t. Cyrus) was out of date before > it was published. It only covers Cyrus v1.6 (it does mention a little > about 2.0), but is still useful as long as you don't take it as gospel

Re: Plus Addressing (ORA book)

2003-12-16 Thread Patrick Goetz
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Pollywog wrote: > There is also an O'Reilly book and some of the book is available online here: > > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mimap/chapter/ch09.html > > > Looks like a book I might want to buy. > Save your money -- this book is hopelessly out of date. I've read it and

Re: Plus Addressing (ORA book)

2003-12-16 Thread Ken Murchison
Pollywog wrote: There is also an O'Reilly book and some of the book is available online here: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mimap/chapter/ch09.html Looks like a book I might want to buy. Unfortunately, a lot of this book (w.r.t. Cyrus) was out of date before it was published. It only covers C

Re: Plus Addressing (ORA book)

2003-12-16 Thread Pollywog
There is also an O'Reilly book and some of the book is available online here: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mimap/chapter/ch09.html Looks like a book I might want to buy. -- Andrew

Re: Plus Addressing

2003-12-16 Thread Pollywog
You might have a look here: http://unix.lsa.umich.edu/docs/imap/imap-2.htm though I am not certain how much of what is shown there applies to your situation. There is some info on setting up shared mailboxes (without Procmail). I might want to set up something like that but I am not certain whet

Plus Addressing

2003-12-16 Thread Wander
Hi, Thanks to Edward Rudd and Pollywog, but I´m not using procmail and the user´s folder has anonymoys p rights. Actually I have one machine receiving/sending e- mails using Postfix as MTA and another one using sendmail and Cyrus Imap. I´ve heard something about comment out Ruleset 5 in sendmail

Re: Plus Addressing

2003-12-15 Thread Edward Rudd
make sure the user anonymous as p rights on the folder.. in cyradm sam user.myuser.myfolder anonymous p On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 14:32, Wander wrote: > Hi list, > > I´m using Postfix with "recipient_delimiter = +" and cyrus imapd and plus > addressing doesn´t work. When

Re: Plus Addressing

2003-12-15 Thread Pollywog
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:32:42 -0300 Wander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > I´m using Postfix with "recipient_delimiter = +" and cyrus imapd and plus > addressing doesn´t work. When sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it goes > > to user Inbox instead o

Plus Addressing

2003-12-15 Thread Wander
Hi list, I´m using Postfix with "recipient_delimiter = +" and cyrus imapd and plus addressing doesn´t work. When sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it goes to user Inbox instead of direct to user´s folder. Please any light? Thanks Wander

Re: plus addressing issues (puremessage followup question)

2003-12-13 Thread Laurent Larquère
PROTECTED]>; "cyrus info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:38 AM Subject: Re: plus addressing issues (puremessage followup question) On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So does anyone in the group have any suggestions

Re: plus addressing issues (puremessage followup question)

2003-10-24 Thread Paul Schiro
Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Schiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "cyrus info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:38 AM Subject: Re: plus addressing issues (puremessage followup question) > On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PR

Re: plus addressing issues (puremessage followup question)

2003-10-24 Thread andrew.caird
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > So does anyone in the group have any suggestions for completely > > disabling plus address handling in the cyrusv2 mailer, or anything > > else that might alleviate my puremessage quarantine release woes? I > > do _not_ need [EMAIL PROTECTED] f

Re: plus addressing issues (puremessage followup question)

2003-10-24 Thread tallison
> > So does anyone in the group have any suggestions for completely disabling > plus address handling in the cyrusv2 mailer, or anything else that might > alleviate my puremessage quarantine release woes? I do _not_ need > [EMAIL PROTECTED] functionality, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any of > that to w

plus addressing issues (puremessage followup question)

2003-10-23 Thread Paul Schiro
So does anyone in the group have any suggestions for completely disabling plus address handling in the cyrusv2 mailer, or anything else that might alleviate my puremessage quarantine release woes? I do _not_ need [EMAIL PROTECTED] functionality, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any of that to work. We do