Re: peculiar lmtpd behavior

2002-12-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Frobbing with the lmtp code, I noticed this thread... On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Kari Hurtta wrote: > > We believe it's this bit of code from savemsg() in lmtpengine.c: > > > > if (!strchr(rpath, '@')) { > > hostname = config_servername; > > } > > fprintf(f, "Return-

Re: peculiar lmtpd behavior

2001-09-22 Thread Pascal Gienger
>In our configuration the set of users that can receive mail locally is >the contents of the assign file. >Messages are passed to deliver via the users' .qmail files. > >The transformation of the Return-Path happens after qmail has >handed off the message to cyrus for final delivery. > >We believe

Re: peculiar lmtpd behavior

2001-09-22 Thread Kari Hurtta
> In our configuration the set of users that can receive mail locally is > the contents of the assign file. > Messages are passed to deliver via the users' .qmail files. > > The transformation of the Return-Path happens after qmail has > handed off the message to cyrus for final delivery. > > We

Re: peculiar lmtpd behavior

2001-09-21 Thread Lisa Maira
In our configuration the set of users that can receive mail locally is the contents of the assign file. Messages are passed to deliver via the users' .qmail files. The transformation of the Return-Path happens after qmail has handed off the message to cyrus for final delivery. We believe it's th

Re: peculiar lmtpd behavior

2001-09-21 Thread Ken Murchison
Tarjei Huse wrote: > > > Cyrus only understands LMTP and IMAP and both of them do not generate > > bounces (Sieve Scripts are a different story, because they are using > > /usr/lib/sendmail when forwarding mail). > Where can I change that to using /usr/sbin/sendmail ? Read imapd.conf(5). Ken

Re: peculiar lmtpd behavior

2001-09-21 Thread Tarjei Huse
> Cyrus only understands LMTP and IMAP and both of them do not generate > bounces (Sieve Scripts are a different story, because they are using > /usr/lib/sendmail when forwarding mail). Where can I change that to using /usr/sbin/sendmail ? :) Tarjei

Re: peculiar lmtpd behavior

2001-09-21 Thread Pascal Gienger
>We are experiencing a behavior in lmtpd such that it inserts >an "@" sign and hostname in the Return-Path if the Return-Path >does not contain an "@" sign. So bounces on our system have a >Return-Path with <@hostname> and no username. > >(As an aside, we are running qmail as opposed to sendmail.)

peculiar lmtpd behavior

2001-09-20 Thread Steve Heist
We are experiencing a behavior in lmtpd such that it inserts an "@" sign and hostname in the Return-Path if the Return-Path does not contain an "@" sign. So bounces on our system have a Return-Path with <@hostname> and no username. (As an aside, we are running qmail as opposed to sendmail.) W