Re: imap and folders

2002-02-13 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2002 16:03:42 -0500, > Joe Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (je) writes: je> isn't what they really have is user/userA/INBOX No. "INBOX" is an alias, if you will, for "user/userA". je> I have several folders that are in the "root" directory tree for my je> user. not for ever

Re: imap and folders

2002-02-13 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On 08 Feb 2002 09:24:17 -0800, > julesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (j) writes: j> However, as Ken pointed out, using the altnamespace option in Cyrus j> 2.1.1 will cause the server to report subdirectories of the INBOX as j> existing at the same level as the INBOX. So, the structure above wou

Re: imap and folders

2002-02-13 Thread julesa
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 06:48, twk wrote: > What you really have is > > /INBOX > /INBOX/archive > > Frankly, I don't understand why people have so much trouble with this. Perhaps > because is is different than what people are used to. It is actually possible to > change the configuration in Outl

Re: imap and folders

2002-02-13 Thread Mathieu Arnold
Gerhard Lehmann wrote: > > Hello, > > - Original Message - > From: "Mathieu Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "info cyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:26 PM > Subject: imap and folders > > >

Re: imap and folders

2002-02-13 Thread Joe Ellis
twk wrote: > Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > >> >> that was not the way I saw it, now, as INBOX is the root, we have for >> instance : >> >> / >> /archive >> >> what could be good would be to get the inbox that way : >> >> / >> /INBOX >> /archive >> >> I don't mean that folders on the root would be a

Re: imap and folders

2002-02-08 Thread Mathieu Arnold
twk wrote: > > What you really have is > > /INBOX > /INBOX/archive that, I know, and I don't really care about it, but... > Frankly, I don't understand why people have so much trouble with this. Perhaps > because is is different than what people are used to. It is actually possible to > chang

Re: imap and folders

2002-02-08 Thread twk
Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > that was not the way I saw it, now, as INBOX is the root, we have for > instance : > > / > /archive > > what could be good would be to get the inbox that way : > > / > /INBOX > /archive > > I don't mean that folders on the root would be accessible to all users, > j

Re: imap and folders

2002-02-08 Thread Earl R Shannon
Hello, I must admit that some email clients make it look like one should be able to create a folder at the same level as the users INBOX. This can never be allowed however. A client/user would essentially have the priveledge of creating accounts if they could do this. Not to mention the problems

Re: imap and folders

2002-02-08 Thread Ken Murchison
Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > Hi > > I was wondering if some day, it would be possible to create folders on > the root and not only in the inbox folder. With v2.1 you have the option of creating your personal folders at the same level as INBOX (not children) by turning on the 'altnamespace' optio

Re: imap and folders

2002-02-08 Thread Gerhard Lehmann
Hello, - Original Message - From: "Mathieu Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "info cyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:26 PM Subject: imap and folders > Hi > > I was wondering if some day, it would be possible to create

imap and folders

2002-02-08 Thread Mathieu Arnold
Hi I was wondering if some day, it would be possible to create folders on the root and not only in the inbox folder. -- Mathieu Arnold