Nicolas KOWALSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> You shouldn't have to do a reconstruct unless there truely is
>> something wrong with the mailbox.
>
> You must be right: after running a reconstruct on my mailbox using the
> 2.2.12 binary , the variou
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You shouldn't have to do a reconstruct unless there truely is
> something wrong with the mailbox.
You must be right: after running a reconstruct on my mailbox using the
2.2.12 binary , the various cyrus.index files sizes shrank
significantly. I also t
--On Monday, February 13, 2006 2:19 PM -0500 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Hello,
I am testing the migration from a 2.2.12 installation, compiled with
the default options (./configure without any option), to a 2.3.1
installation, also compiled with the defau
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>> I am testing the migration from a 2.2.12 installation, compiled with
>> the default options (./configure without any option), to a 2.3.1
>> installation, also compiled with the default options. The databases
>> used are the de
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Hello,
I am testing the migration from a 2.2.12 installation, compiled with
the default options (./configure without any option), to a 2.3.1
installation, also compiled with the default options. The databases
used are the default for both. The system is Debian 3.1, using
Hello,
I am testing the migration from a 2.2.12 installation, compiled with
the default options (./configure without any option), to a 2.3.1
installation, also compiled with the default options. The databases
used are the default for both. The system is Debian 3.1, using db3 for
the berkeley datab
