Nicolas KOWALSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> You shouldn't have to do a reconstruct unless there truely is >> something wrong with the mailbox. > > You must be right: after running a reconstruct on my mailbox using the > 2.2.12 binary , the various cyrus.index files sizes shrank > significantly. I also tested with some of the mailboxes which caused > problems, and saw the same behaviour. > > So, there must be some garbage (coming from where, I do not know), > that implies running a reconstruct of probably all mailboxes, just to > be sure I have all of them consistents.
Yes, it worked. :-) After I reconstructed all mailboxes, I switched to 2.3.1 binaries (plus the patch from S. Matter for the deliver crash), and everything started fine, without any error. Thanks for all. PS: I am however still surprised by the garbage that came into some mailboxes ; this 2.2.12 installation has less than one year of production use... -- Nicolas ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
