Re: cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 with sendmail-8.12.11 integration "niggle".

2006-01-21 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > I personally prefer to reject spam *in smtp session*. I'm quite happy with dspam - it catches the majority of my spam and I haven't had any false positives since I reinstalled it a few months ago. (Touch wood). > Any reaso

Re: cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 with sendmail-8.12.11 integration "niggle".

2006-01-20 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Benjamin Donnachie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > > You can use F=1 mailer flag to make sendmail *strip* (remove) null bytes > > from *headers* before relaying message to cyrus imap. > > Ah! The 1 flag isn't listed on the FAQ I was using as a reference! > > > I think

Re: cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 with sendmail-8.12.11 integration "niggle".

2006-01-20 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > You can use F=1 mailer flag to make sendmail *strip* (remove) null bytes > from *headers* before relaying message to cyrus imap. Ah! The 1 flag isn't listed on the FAQ I was using as a reference! > I think that rejecting

Re: cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 with sendmail-8.12.11 integration "niggle".

2006-01-20 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Benjamin Donnachie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > > Post another confirmation for future readers after a few days of using it. > > I have seen a few ugly surprises created by aliases and rule set 5 > > interactions (low but non zero chance). > > Still works! :-) > > A

Re: cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 with sendmail-8.12.11 integration "niggle".

2006-01-20 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > Post another confirmation for future readers after a few days of using it. > I have seen a few ugly surprises created by aliases and rule set 5 > interactions (low but non zero chance). Still works! :-) A little cheeky...

Re: cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 with sendmail-8.12.11 integration "niggle".

2006-01-17 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Benjamin Donnachie wrote: Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: How it is supposed to work: * flag F=5 will turn on processing of rule set 5 * checks done by F=w flag will be done by "error" luser relay in rule set 5 * preserve_local_plus_detail will stop sendmail from stripping +detail in rule set 5 You

Re: cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 with sendmail-8.12.11 integration "niggle".

2006-01-17 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > How it is supposed to work: > * flag F=5 will turn on processing of rule set file > * checks done by F=w flag will be done by "error" luser relay in rule set 5 > * preserve_local_plus_detail will stop sendmail from stripping

Re: cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 with sendmail-8.12.11 integration "niggle".

2006-01-17 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Benjamin Donnachie wrote: At the moment, I use shadow passwords for cyrus-imapd authentication and I would like sendmail to reject any message for which the recipient does not have an account on the server. This is complicated because I use "plussed" addresses with cyrus-imapd; if I enable

cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 with sendmail-8.12.11 integration "niggle".

2006-01-17 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
At the moment, I use shadow passwords for cyrus-imapd authentication and I would like sendmail to reject any message for which the recipient does not have an account on the server. This is complicated because I use "plussed" addresses with cyrus-imapd; if I enable the "w" sendmail mailer opt