On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Stefan Pampel antispam
wrote:
> Alain Spineux schrieb am 11.12.2008 08:15:
>
>> I dont see nothing wrong in your main.cf
>> Can you post your master.cf ?
>
> ok, here is the master.cf
I dont see anything vrong,
ask your question to the postfix mailing list !
>
>
Alain Spineux schrieb am 11.12.2008 08:15:
> I dont see nothing wrong in your main.cf
> Can you post your master.cf ?
ok, here is the master.cf
thx, and bye
Stefan
#
# Postfix master process configuration file. For details on the format
# of the file, see the master(5) manual page (command: "
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Stefan Pampel antispam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> thanks for you replies.
>
> ["Followup-To:" nach gmane.mail.imap.cyrus gesetzt.]
> Lan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> From: "Alain Spineux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:59
Hello all,
thanks for you replies.
["Followup-To:" nach gmane.mail.imap.cyrus gesetzt.]
Lan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> From: "Alain Spineux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Stefan Pampel
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash
- Original Message -
From: "Alain Spineux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 2:03 AM
Subject: Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set
>I made multiple comments , look carefully
>
&
I made multiple comments , look carefully
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Stefan Pampel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Pampel
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> it
Stefan Pampel wrote:
>>> Mails basically reach the INBOX, but not the folder itself
I think this is an MTA problem, rather than a Cyrus problem.
> Received: from foo.org ([127.0.0.1])
> by localhost (foo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
> with LMTP id ggSVa5nIr8Oq for <[EMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Pampel
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it seems that plus addressing not work in my case:
>>
>> postfix configured correctly:
>> main.cf:
>> recipient_delimiter = +
>>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Pampel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems that plus addressing not work in my case:
>
> postfix configured correctly:
> main.cf:
> recipient_delimiter = +
>
> master.cf:
> lmtp unix -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Quoting Stefan Pampel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> it seems that plus addressing not work in my case:
>>
>> postfix configured correctly:
>> main.cf:
>> recipient_delimiter = +
>>
>> master.cf:
>> lmtp unix
Quoting Stefan Pampel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems that plus addressing not work in my case:
>
> postfix configured correctly:
> main.cf:
> recipient_delimiter = +
>
> master.cf:
> lmtp unix - - n - -
Has anyone had success with using plus addressing to send to a
specific mail folder when the folder name has a space in it?
With cyrus 2.3 you can enable:
lmtp_fuzzy_mailbox_match: 1
From imapd.conf
lmtp_fuzzy_mailbox_match: 0
If enabled, and the mailbox specified in the
--On Friday, March 17, 2006 11:57 AM -0500 Steve Huston
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 03/17/2006 11:51 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Stefano Santoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... and if you plan to deliver to subfolders DO make sure that the
subfolder names are all lowercase.
INBOX.junk not INBO
On 03/17/2006 11:51 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> Stefano Santoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ... and if you plan to deliver to subfolders DO make sure that the
>> subfolder names are all lowercase.
>> INBOX.junk not INBOX.Junk
> What makes this necessary?
I would guess that's only true if you hav
... and if you plan to deliver to subfolders DO make sure that the
subfolder names are all lowercase.
INBOX.junk not INBOX.Junk
Ciao
Stefano
On Fri, March 17, 2006 11:01 am, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> Use LMTP.
> Make sure main.cf has "recipient_delimiter = +"
> You don't need special permissi
Stefano Santoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... and if you plan to deliver to subfolders DO make sure that the
subfolder names are all lowercase.
INBOX.junk not INBOX.Junk
What makes this necessary?
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.w
Use LMTP.
Make sure main.cf has "recipient_delimiter = +"
You don't need special permissions to deliver to a user's INBOX, but if
you want to deliver to a subfolder, the subfolder must have "anyone p".
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:info-cyrus-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] O
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 18:54 -0700, Huaqing Zheng wrote:
> On 9/21/05, Zachariah Mully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello all-
> > I'm in the process of moving from a qmail/uw-imap installation to a
> > postfix/Cyrus-2.2 and I've one last problem to solve before I can start
> > moving peop
On 9/21/05, Zachariah Mully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all-
> I'm in the process of moving from a qmail/uw-imap installation to a
> postfix/Cyrus-2.2 and I've one last problem to solve before I can start
> moving people onto the new system.
> We make heavy use of qmail's ext
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Wander wrote:
> Actually I´m still using version 1.6.24. Ok people, I know it´s completely out
> of date, but kind of internal problems... This chapter certainly will be
> useful also if something different from "anonymous p" or even "anyone p" can
> be said, since this was th
Thanks Pollywog,
Actually I´m still using version 1.6.24. Ok people, I know it´s completely out
of date, but kind of internal problems... This chapter certainly will be
useful also if something different from "anonymous p" or even "anyone p" can
be said, since this was the first thing I did.
Th
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:46:21 -0500
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, a lot of this book (w.r.t. Cyrus) was out of date before
> it was published. It only covers Cyrus v1.6 (it does mention a little
> about 2.0), but is still useful as long as you don't take it as gospel
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Pollywog wrote:
> There is also an O'Reilly book and some of the book is available online here:
>
> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mimap/chapter/ch09.html
>
>
> Looks like a book I might want to buy.
>
Save your money -- this book is hopelessly out of date. I've read it and
Pollywog wrote:
There is also an O'Reilly book and some of the book is available online here:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mimap/chapter/ch09.html
Looks like a book I might want to buy.
Unfortunately, a lot of this book (w.r.t. Cyrus) was out of date before
it was published. It only covers C
There is also an O'Reilly book and some of the book is available online here:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mimap/chapter/ch09.html
Looks like a book I might want to buy.
--
Andrew
You might have a look here:
http://unix.lsa.umich.edu/docs/imap/imap-2.htm though I am not certain how
much of what is shown there applies to your situation. There is some info on
setting up shared mailboxes (without Procmail). I might want to set up
something like that but I am not certain whet
make sure the user anonymous as p rights on the folder..
in cyradm
sam user.myuser.myfolder anonymous p
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 14:32, Wander wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I´m using Postfix with "recipient_delimiter = +" and cyrus imapd and plus
> addressing doesn´t work. When sending mail to [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:32:42 -0300
Wander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I´m using Postfix with "recipient_delimiter = +" and cyrus imapd and plus
> addressing doesn´t work. When sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it goes
>
> to user Inbox instead of direct to user´s folder.
>
Are y
PROTECTED]>; "cyrus info"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: plus addressing issues (puremessage followup question)
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So does anyone in the group have any suggestions
Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Schiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "cyrus info"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: plus addressing issues (puremessage followup question)
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PR
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > So does anyone in the group have any suggestions for completely
> > disabling plus address handling in the cyrusv2 mailer, or anything
> > else that might alleviate my puremessage quarantine release woes? I
> > do _not_ need [EMAIL PROTECTED] f
>
> So does anyone in the group have any suggestions for completely disabling
> plus address handling in the cyrusv2 mailer, or anything else that might
> alleviate my puremessage quarantine release woes? I do _not_ need
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] functionality, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any of
> that to w
32 matches
Mail list logo
