Re: Webmail

2006-10-17 Thread mailing
Thanks a lot to everyone!!! I'll try all the solutions you have suggested and I'm sure I'll solve my problems! Stefano C Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 16 October 2006 16:47, Zachariah Mully wrote: > Yes, that's what I was alluding to... Outlook+Horde+Kolab does not work > well at all. Cyrus does seem to work pretty well with Egroupware. wt -- Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator Colorado State University, Dept.

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Zachariah Mully
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 23:24 +0200, Martin G.H. Minkler wrote: > Zachariah Mully wrote: > > > > I would stay far far away from kolab for anything more than one or two > > person use. Especially if you plan on using it with Outlook as the > > Outlook connector stores the Kolab data in a binary forma

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Martin G.H. Minkler
Zachariah Mully wrote: I would stay far far away from kolab for anything more than one or two person use. Especially if you plan on using it with Outlook as the Outlook connector stores the Kolab data in a binary format, making it unsearchable on the server side, hence retardedly slow as you nee

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Martin G.H. Minkler
Alexandros Vellis wrote: On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 14:13 +0200, Martin G.H. Minkler wrote: Generally I haven't had any problems with squirrelmail except that I didn't manage to configure it to use plaintext+TLS auth since it won't use STARTTLS according to IMAPS but tries to establish a classic SS

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Alexandros Vellis
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 14:13 +0200, Martin G.H. Minkler wrote: > Generally I haven't had any problems with squirrelmail except that I > didn't manage to configure it to use plaintext+TLS auth since it won't > use STARTTLS according to IMAPS but tries to establish a classic SSL > layer with the s

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 06:57 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello everyone! > I would realize a webmail system based on Cyrus IMAP. > What can you suggest me? > I've find out these different products that could be usefull for my purposes: > 1) > Squirremail > 2) > Horde-IMP > 3) > Openwebmail >

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Zachariah Mully
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 14:13 +0200, Martin G.H. Minkler wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > > > I would use Horde because it seems there is a gorupware Horde-based that > > should be so cool. > > It could be fantastic if Horde could interface with MS Outlook to share > > contacts and other inform

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Daniel Eckl
Hi! I have tried squirrelmail and horde IMP. While squirrelmail is very easy to implement, I prefer IMP for it's superior feature list But it's a hell to configure it the first time with all it's thousand options because I found most of them having the wrong default in my opinion. Best, Daniel

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Michael Menge
Hi, I only know a older version of Squirremail as user and the Horde as Admin. So i will only say something to Horde. We are running Horde with IMP, Ingo, Turba, Kronolithe, Nag and Mnemo. Horde supports the features of cyrus like (quota Display, ACL and timesiev). The Turba, Kronolithe, Nag an

Re: Webmail

2006-10-16 Thread Martin G.H. Minkler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I would use Horde because it seems there is a gorupware Horde-based that should be so cool. It could be fantastic if Horde could interface with MS Outlook to share contacts and other informaions. Does anyone have some experiences in that way? If You're looking for g

Re: webmail not saving to sent-mail

2006-07-18 Thread Dave McMurtrie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We have moved our mail server to a new version of cyrus. We have just discovered that webmail (IMP) is not able to save sent messages to the existing sent-mail folder. localhost> lm user/[EMAIL PROTECTED] user/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (\HasChildren) localhost> lm use

Re: webmail+kerberos+cyrus imapd

2006-04-15 Thread ph rhole oper
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:21:02 -0400, "Jeffrey T Eaton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > My curus-imapd authenticates using gssapi kerberos5. > > Is there a webmail system that authenticates users to the cyrus-imapd > > using kerberos5? > > Maybe through pubcookie? > > I cannot find any directions.. >

Re: webmail+kerberos+cyrus imapd

2006-04-13 Thread Stuart Morrison
I use an implementation of Horde + Imp to provide webmail services. I do not use Kerberos myself although I believe it is an option with Horde + Imp. Horde's homepage is http://www.horde.org (I feel as though this is getting a bit off topic!) If you go for Horde to get started you will need

Re: webmail+kerberos+cyrus imapd

2006-04-13 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
--- Jeffrey T Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My curus-imapd authenticates using gssapi kerberos5. > > Is there a webmail system that authenticates users to the cyrus-imapd > > using kerberos5? > > Maybe through pubcookie? > > I cannot find any directions.. > > At CMU, we are using a slightl

Re: webmail+kerberos+cyrus imapd

2006-04-12 Thread Jeffrey T Eaton
> My curus-imapd authenticates using gssapi kerberos5. > Is there a webmail system that authenticates users to the cyrus-imapd > using kerberos5? > Maybe through pubcookie? > I cannot find any directions.. At CMU, we are using a slightly modiffied version of SquirrelMail which uses pubcookie with

Re: Webmail?

2004-03-12 Thread Edward Rudd
I'm running horde 2.2.4 and IMP 3.2.2, and RELENG_1 release of Ingo (for sieve support). On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 19:11, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > Etienne Goyer wrote: > > > I run Horde/IMP with Cyrus-imapd successfully, but I would not dare call > > it "fairly simple". Config is actually quite comp

Re: Webmail?

2004-03-12 Thread Kendrick Vargas
Etienne Goyer wrote: I run Horde/IMP with Cyrus-imapd successfully, but I would not dare call it "fairly simple". Config is actually quite complicated, but it support most of Cyrus features (Sieve, ACL, quota, etc). Feel free to ask any question you might have about my setup. Ok... what version o

Re: Webmail?

2004-03-12 Thread Etienne Goyer
I run Horde/IMP with Cyrus-imapd successfully, but I would not dare call it "fairly simple". Config is actually quite complicated, but it support most of Cyrus features (Sieve, ACL, quota, etc). Feel free to ask any question you might have about my setup. On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:58:06PM +0100

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-16 Thread Etienne Goyer
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 02:11:35PM -0700, James Satterfield wrote: > Is there a sieve builder plugin for IMP? Yes, it's called Ingo. It does have some limitation (ie it does not use TLS) and require to use a snapshot or CVS version of Horde. -- Etienne GoyerLinux Québec Tec

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Jeff Warnica
Ive been using horde/imp for years and I never recall this to be the case. Its all in php in your webserver, so runs at whatever you have that set up as. The excption may be the imap proxy (which keeps a imap session alive because things run in a webserver will of course be short lived)... If you

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Joakim Ryden
On 2003.07.15 18:49 Wil Cooley wrote: => On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 07:27, Etienne Goyer wrote: => > I love IMP. It's very flexible and have a ton of features. But, => as => > somebody else mentioned, it's a pain to configure. => => This is quickly getting OT, and I apologize in advance to the rest o

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Wil Cooley
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 18:49, Wil Cooley wrote: > This is quickly getting OT, and I apologize in advance to the rest of > the list, but does Horde still require some parts to run SUID root? The > last time I really looked at it was several years ago, and it did then > if memory serves. Ignore me;

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Wil Cooley
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 07:27, Etienne Goyer wrote: > I love IMP. It's very flexible and have a ton of features. But, as > somebody else mentioned, it's a pain to configure. This is quickly getting OT, and I apologize in advance to the rest of the list, but does Horde still require some parts to r

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Jeff Warnica
'IMP' is the mail reader component from the Horde project. They also have components for what you mention sieve rule builder => Ingo (procmail as well via ftp)[1] calender => Kronolith address book => Turba and pleanty of other components. Kronolith and Turba are both stable, ha

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread James Satterfield
Is there a sieve builder plugin for IMP? I'm already heading down the road with IMP/Horde. About half way installed. Thus far, Horde has been quite simple. My biggest problems have been dealing with the FreeBSD ports. php4 in particular pissed me off to no end. ALL_OPTIONS=BCMATH BZIP2 CALEND

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Chris Hilts
> Squirrel mail has more plugins but is spread out over the system more Say what? SquirrelMail is completely self-contained in one directory structure. I have it in /projects/squirrelmail on my development machine, and /usr/local/share/squirrelmail on my production server. How is it spread out?

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, James Satterfield wrote: > Is there a sieve builder plugin for IMP? > I'm already heading down the road with IMP/Horde. About half way installed. > Thus far, Horde has been quite simple. My biggest problems have been dealing > with the FreeBSD ports. php4 in particular pissed

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Chris Hilts
> Hi! Is it possible to use SSL/TLS connections to IMAP server from > squirellmail? Yes. *IF* you have PHP 4.3.x, SquirrelMail 1.4.x, and Cyrus listening for IMAPS connections (ie. no STARTTLS command required) -- Chris Hilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SqurrelMail and TLS support (was: Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?)

2003-07-15 Thread Jonathan Marsden
On 15 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Is it possible to use SSL/TLS connections to IMAP server from > squirellmail? Yes, you can do that. Set the parameter: $use_imap_tls = true; in the /etc/squirrelmail/config.php file, and as long as you are running PHP 4.3 or later and have the open

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread tsg
Hi! Is it possible to use SSL/TLS connections to IMAP server from squirellmail? Sergios 15 Июль 2003 20:53, Michael J Barber написал: > I don't want to get into a lengthy discussion of features but Imp has > spellchecking as well. It is one package and one line in the config. The > package ispe

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Brett Thomson
I use Horde/Imp to supply webmail for the company I work for. I have no complaints about either package, we tested both and went with Horde for the reasons Michael suggested and mainly for the spell checking capabilities. Staff have found the web interface of horde/imp so good they use webmail inte

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Andrew Morgan
I don't want to get into a big feature comparison between Horde/IMP and other webmail software, but have you guys looked at the Horde projects website (http://www.horde.org/projects.php) lately? There are a LOT of Horde modules out there. We use the main ones here at OSU: IMP (mail), Turba (cont

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Michael J Barber
I don't want to get into a lengthy discussion of features but Imp has spellchecking as well. It is one package and one line in the config. The package ispell (I think) is on most systems I believe. They both are very nice and work very well. Horde/Imp/... has a very nice self contained structur

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Richard Houston
I agree and lets not forget the huge list of plug-ins that can be installed to further extend the already feature rich system. The spell checker plug in was a huge + for my users. Thanks Rich On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 12:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I used to think that IMP was the best choice, b

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Marcelino Vallejo
I agree with Scott, Squirrelmail has lots of contributed plugins such as sieve rule builder, calendar, address book, that makes it an intresting choice. The only what remains to do is to improve the folders tree view, but it can be deployed in minutes without to much effort. Regards James Satt

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread scott
I used to think that IMP was the best choice, but now I think SquirrelMail has surpassed it - or if not, it soon will. Tracking the two projects over time, SquirrelMail seems to have a much faster development model by being very open to code contributions and suggestions from outside developers

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Ronen Amity
Horde IMP is the best choise. At 05:48 PM 7/15/2003, David A Powicki wrote: I also recommend IMP. It does have a steep learning curve, but once you figure out what is going on it is very powerful. It has a number of great features for a web-based mail client and with the additional applications

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread David A Powicki
I also recommend IMP. It does have a steep learning curve, but once you figure out what is going on it is very powerful. It has a number of great features for a web-based mail client and with the additional applications in the Horde framework you have the potential for a Portal application. We

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Etienne Goyer
I love IMP. It's very flexible and have a ton of features. But, as somebody else mentioned, it's a pain to configure. On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:57:07PM -0700, James Satterfield wrote: > What webmail frontend would you all recommend? > > James. -- Etienne GoyerLinux Québec

RE: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-15 Thread Mobeen Azhar
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James A. Pattie Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 18:19 To: James Satterfield Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Webmail -- What's recommended? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Satterfield wrote: | What webmail frontend would yo

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-14 Thread Andre Nicholson
I always see alot of people talk about Horde. I once tried installing the thing but gave up after a few hours of reading documentation and installation instructions. I'm using SquirrelMail on my own servers plus all of my company's client's servers. Works flawlessly with Cyrus, at least it has wi

Re: Webmail -- What's recommended?

2003-07-14 Thread James A. Pattie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Satterfield wrote: | What webmail frontend would you all recommend? | | James. | | horde and imp. www.horde.org - -- James A. Pattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux -- SysAdmin / Programmer Xperience, Inc. http://www.pcxperience.com/ http://www.xperie

Re: Webmail application that doesn't abuse the IMAP server?

2003-06-12 Thread Mikael Brandström
The IMHO webmail for the Roxen web server, and the derived CAMAS for Caudim webserver both use persistent IMAP connections. I've used an old version of IMHO for quite some without any major problems. Mikael URLS: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~stewa/IMHO/ http://camas.caudium.net/camas/index.rxml O

Re: Webmail application that doesn't abuse the IMAP server?

2003-06-11 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Ted Fines wrote: > Unless the imap connection has a mailbox open. That ties up a potentially > very large memory resource (depending on the size of the mailbox) on the > server. > > I have to say I don't know for certain whether that's true for the cyrus > imapd, but for othe

Re: Webmail application that doesn't abuse the IMAP server?

2003-06-11 Thread Ted Fines
I'm not sure how the httpd processes are being tied up, but "tied up" imapds that are otherwise idle don't cost you anything except some swap and a process table entry. They're basicly free. Unless the imap connection has a mailbox open. That ties up a potentially very large memory resource (dep

Re: Webmail application that doesn't abuse the IMAP server?

2003-06-10 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Gary Mills wrote: > We do use that, and it probably does improve performance. It does have > a problem with idle browser connections that accumulate with time. > This also ties up a lot of `imapd' and `httpd' processes. It probably > needs a client timeout someplace. I have

Re: Webmail application that doesn't abuse the IMAP server?

2003-06-10 Thread Gary Mills
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:27:13PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote: > > Gary Mills wrote: > >Does anyone know of an e-mail web application that doesn't abuse the > >IMAP server by making short connections? Most of them simply connect > >and disconnect with each HTTP transaction. Is there one that beh

Re: Webmail application that doesn't abuse the IMAP server?

2003-06-10 Thread Ken Murchison
Gary Mills wrote: Does anyone know of an e-mail web application that doesn't abuse the IMAP server by making short connections? Most of them simply connect and disconnect with each HTTP transaction. Is there one that behaves the same as an IMAP client, using one connection for the duration of t

Re: Webmail application that doesn't abuse the IMAP server?

2003-06-10 Thread Dave McMurtrie
Prayer does. You'll have to google it, though. I don't know much about it. Thanks, Dave -- Dave McMurtrie, Systems Programmer University of Pittsburgh Computing Services and Systems Development, Development Services -- UNIX and VMS Services 717P Cathedral of Learning (412)-624-6413 On Tue, 10

Re: webmail

2002-02-22 Thread twk
> On 02/22/2002 02:12 PM, Steve Wright wrote: > >> Can someone recommend me a good webmail package ? >> At somepoint in the near future I will need to setup webmail on our >> production servers & after seeing the security squirrelmail offers I >> think it will be very hard to make a case for i

Re: webmail

2002-02-22 Thread Steven M Bloomfield
Try www.squirrelmail.org It's great! Loads of extra plugin options, based around PHP scripts. It's ded easy to modify to your needs and is 'community' orientated. My reason for picking a webmail was... what do I want my webmail package to do? Do you require spell checking? POP3 access? Filters?

Re: webmail

2002-02-22 Thread david eitzinger
You might have a look at TWIG ( http://twig.screwdriver.net ) We've been using it over two years and it's highly modular and can very easily be extended to add support for quotas, multiple domains and the like. It also supports various DBs, mailservers, authentication mechanisms. For a preview

Re: webmail

2002-02-22 Thread kboyd
Hi Steve, I just installed silkymail over my cyrus/sendmail Solaris 8 system. I am very impressed with the ease of install (including SSL). It is bundled with its own Apache server. You sort of pull the string and it inflates. ;) It appears extremely robust and my webmaster and I are going

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-14 Thread Craig Skinner
see http://www.firstpr.com.au/web-mail/ and http://www.cru.fr/http-mail/ -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze

RE: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-13 Thread Lee Hoffman
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:59 AM To: Robert Scussel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ? Robert Scussel schrieb am Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:51:21PM -0500: * Thanks, first of all for the help getting cyrus working with * saslauthd-pam... * * I have been trying for day

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-13 Thread Paul M Fleming
A trick with SASL if you don't use the /etc/sasldb stuff is to compile with "--with-dblib=none" and it will remove the sasl secrets database code entirely.. We only use Kerberos so we didn't need any of the /etc/sasldb stuff either. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Robert Scussel schrieb am Wed, D

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-13 Thread birger
Robert Scussel schrieb am Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:51:21PM -0500: * Thanks, first of all for the help getting cyrus working with * saslauthd-pam... * * I have been trying for days now to get the latest IMP(3.0) with the * latest Horde(2.0) to work with cyrus. The problem now is that imp tries

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread Robert Scussel
Thanks, first of all for the help getting cyrus working with saslauthd-pam... I have been trying for days now to get the latest IMP(3.0) with the latest Horde(2.0) to work with cyrus. The problem now is that imp tries to use the protocol imap to logon, which then tries to logon via C

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread Alex Kamalov
Thank You very much for each and every one replied. Now I know what to use!! :) Thanks again. Alex

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:14:23 +0100, > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sj) writes: sj> This was a interesting thread, and I was happy to see that at least sj> one suggestion, Jawmail, supported WAP, but it caused my stock RedHat sj> 7.1 Apache/PHP build to crash when I ran "install.

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread Simon Josefsson
This was a interesting thread, and I was happy to see that at least one suggestion, Jawmail, supported WAP, but it caused my stock RedHat 7.1 Apache/PHP build to crash when I ran "install.php"... So, are there any other IMAP interfaces with WML support? Any experiences?

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread Ronen Amity
i am using imp from www.horde.org. it is a good sollution with a very easy web interface (it was tricky to install though - it took time untill i found install guide.) the best of all - it is free. On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jure Pecar wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:18:34 -0500 > "Alex Kamalov" <[

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread simon
Alex Kamalov wrote: > > Guys, > > I was wondering if anyone can tell me a preferred webmail interface for > cyrus-imap ? Which one should I use that could be relatively painless, > albeit with functionality ? > I have on my system IMP --- Good very big in code source terms but is designed

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread Paul M Fleming
We use IMP (www.horde.org). It handles the Cyrus naming space pretty well. Jure Pecar wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:18:34 -0500 > "Alex Kamalov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > I was wondering if anyone can tell me a preferred webmail interface for > > cyrus-imap ? Which one

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread Jure Pecar
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:18:34 -0500 "Alex Kamalov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, > > I was wondering if anyone can tell me a preferred webmail interface for > cyrus-imap ? Which one should I use that could be relatively painless, > albeit with functionality ? > Try jawmail (jawmail.sf.net)

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread twk
> >>Guys, >> >>I was wondering if anyone can tell me a preferred webmail interface for >>cyrus-imap ? Which one should I use that could be relatively painless, >>albeit with functionality ? >> >>Thanks a lot to everyone. >> We use IMHO (http://www.lysator.liu.se/~stewa/IMHO/) with our Roxen we

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread Craig Skinner
> Guys, > > I was wondering if anyone can tell me a preferred webmail interface for > cyrus-imap ? Which one should I use that could be relatively painless, > albeit with functionality ? > > Thanks a lot to everyone. > > Alex > > http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail/ Here's just some of what t

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-12 Thread Mihai Amariutei
Try Squirrelmail (http://www.squirrelmail.org ) Extremely eazy to setup and yes, it do support subfolders. Mihai - Original Message - From: "Alex Kamalov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:18 AM Subject: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ? > Guys, >

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-11 Thread Haim Dimermanas
Does it support sub folders? The current stable version (2.2.6) of IMP (http://www.horde.org/imp/) does not support folder trees but the beta one (2.2.7) does. If you interested on setting up IMP I have a doc on my site. Haim http://dudle.linuxroot.org Joe Stump wrote: > > Squirrel

Re: Webmail for Cyrus Imap ?

2001-12-11 Thread Joe Stump
Squirrel Mail worked great for me. --Joe On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:18:34PM -0500, Alex Kamalov wrote: > Guys, > > I was wondering if anyone can tell me a preferred webmail interface for > cyrus-imap ? Which one should I use that could be relatively painless, > albeit with functionality ? > >

Re: IMSP and address synchronization support (was Re: Webmail Client)

2001-09-14 Thread Jeremy Howard
Cyrus Daboo wrote: > Our products Mulberry and SilkyMail are pretty much the only shipping > clients that use IMSP. The old Simeon/ExecMail client used IMSP too, but > that is no longer being supported. The SilkyMail IMSP support is provided > as a PHP module. This is currently not available as pa

Re: Webmail Client & Question for Windows Client

2001-09-14 Thread Jeremy Howard
Evil Azrael wrote: > But knows anybody a good client for Windows? Outlook is too unsecure > for my taste, netscape lacks a lot of features i would like too see > and my favorite "The Bat!" doesn´t seem to be an IMAP client at all. > somehow it looks that´s just a POP3 client that can also fetch ma

IMSP and address synchronization support (was Re: Webmail Client)

2001-09-14 Thread Jeremy Howard
Michel Jouvin wrote: > In particular, Silkymail has support for IMSP preferences and adress > books, A very interesting feature if you want user being able to share > address books between Webmail and other mail clients. > What clients support IMSP? Is this support synchronization/off-line access

Re: Webmail Client

2001-09-14 Thread Jules Agee
Evil Azrael wrote: >Guten Tag Richard Hopkins, >RH> SilkyMail from Cyrusoft > >RH> http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail/ > >RH> is well worth a look. > >Not really... somehow it feels like horde/imp and the url of the >program where you are being redirected has imp in it´s path part. > >Christop

Re: Webmail Client

2001-09-14 Thread Michel Jouvin
In particular, Silkymail has support for IMSP preferences and adress books, A very interesting feature if you want user being able to share address books between Webmail and other mail clients. Michel On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:06:58 +0100 Richard Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > SilkyMai

Re: Webmail Client

2001-09-14 Thread Justin R. Miller
Thus spake Rehuel Lobato de Mesquita ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Can anyone recommend an open source "yahoo/hotmail-like" mail client? I would second the recommendation for SquirrelMail. The user community is also very helpful. -- | Justin R. Miller / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 0xC9C40C31 | Of all the th

Re: Webmail Client

2001-09-14 Thread Oyku Gencay
You may check out IMP (www.horde.org) or Squirrel Mail. (www.squirrelmail.org) THere are many more but the choice depends on your requirements.   Regards, Oyku Gencay   - Original Message - From: Rehuel Lobato de Mesquita To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, Septembe

Re: Webmail Client & Question for Windows Client

2001-09-14 Thread Jean-Christophe Kermagoret
Just have a look at this webmail compare matrix : http://members.ferrara.linux.it/gmeneghetti/webmailcompare/ Bye Evil Azrael wrote: > Guten Tag Rehuel Lobato de Mesquita, > > i have recently checked some webmail clients. my special requirement > was that the client must not need mysql (i hate m

Re: Webmail Client

2001-09-14 Thread Richard Hopkins
SilkyMail from Cyrusoft http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail/ is well worth a look. On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:38:01 -0300 Rehuel Lobato de Mesquita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey guys > > Can anyone recommend an open source "yahoo/hotmail-like" mail client? > > Rehuel Richard Hopkins, Inf

Re: Webmail Client & Question for Windows Client

2001-09-14 Thread Evil Azrael
Guten Tag Rehuel Lobato de Mesquita, i have recently checked some webmail clients. my special requirement was that the client must not need mysql (i hate mysql; PostgreSQL rulez !). You can find the following at freshmeat.net : SquirrelMail The one i will go to use. It´s special feature is that

Re: Webmail Client

2001-09-14 Thread Darin Perusich
check out squirrelmail, http://www.squirrelmail.org/. it's gnu, written in php4 and fast. > Rehuel Lobato de Mesquita wrote: > > Hey guys > > Can anyone recommend an open source "yahoo/hotmail-like" mail client? > > Rehuel -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corp. [EMAIL P

Re: WebMail

2001-01-12 Thread Mihai Amariutei
IMP is very widely used and very good indeed. However, at times may be somewhat tricky to make it work. You may also try squirrelmail ( www.squirrelmail.org), it's a breeze to install and quite good (and showing some growth potential). Mihai Amariutei - Original Message - From: "Peter E

Re: WebMail

2001-01-11 Thread ronen amity
I agree, IMP from horde DO THE JOB. it is very easy to install, and they have there a good HOWTO. we added ssl to the apache, and it works fine. you can also set up any authontication that you want very easy. ronen amity At 19:46 01/10/2001 -0400, Patrick Boutilier wrote: >Peter, > >IMP is w

Re: WebMail

2001-01-10 Thread Patrick Boutilier
Peter, IMP is what we use (http://www.horde.org). As for authentication IMP authenticates against the IMAP server. It is up to the IMAP server what kind of authentication it does. Peter Erickson wrote: > Okay I finally got Cyrus Imap up and working and am looking at adding > WebMail. I know tha