Re: Looking for root cause of sig 11 on imapd

2001-07-06 Thread William K. Hardeman
Ken, I just wanted to second Scott on your patch fixing the problem. I implemented it yesterday afternoon and haven't seen another signal 11 on imapd since (although I'm seeing them on lmtpd now). Thanks for the good work and the quick response. Will --On Thursday, 05 July, 2001 15:47 -0400

Re: Looking for root cause of sig 11 on imapd

2001-07-05 Thread Scott Russell
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:24:25PM +0200, GOMBAS Gabor wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:01:20PM -0400, Scott Russell wrote: > > > No core files are generated when a sig 11 happens so a gdb trace isn't > > available. > > Are you sure there are no limits on the core file size? On most Linux sys

Re: Looking for root cause of sig 11 on imapd

2001-07-05 Thread Ken Murchison
GOMBAS Gabor wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:01:20PM -0400, Scott Russell wrote: > > Well, I've been running 2.0.14 for over a month now and I haven't seen any > "signaled to death" messages (or any other problems) with it. Some older > versions did have problems, but 2.0.14 works nicely

Re: Looking for root cause of sig 11 on imapd

2001-07-05 Thread GOMBAS Gabor
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:01:20PM -0400, Scott Russell wrote: > No core files are generated when a sig 11 happens so a gdb trace isn't > available. Are you sure there are no limits on the core file size? On most Linux systems it defaults to 0 thus preventing the creation of any core files. > O

Re: Looking for root cause of sig 11 on imapd

2001-07-05 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Russell wrote: > > Ken - > > The patch you supplied 'fixed' it. (I'm not sure why not being a C coder > myself). Does this patch actually fix the problem or does it back out a > change that was added going from 2.0.13 to 2.0.14? It should fix the problem. Basically, imapd processes are

Re: Looking for root cause of sig 11 on imapd

2001-07-05 Thread Scott Russell
Ken - The patch you supplied 'fixed' it. (I'm not sure why not being a C coder myself). Does this patch actually fix the problem or does it back out a change that was added going from 2.0.13 to 2.0.14? Side note, the patch didn't apply cleanly. Hunk2 failed even after I fixed the line wrap damag

Re: Looking for root cause of sig 11 on imapd

2001-07-05 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Russell wrote: > > All - > > I'm new to Cyrus and have been experiencing sig 11 issues on imapd over the > past 2 weeks. I've spent a great deal of time reading the list archives > trying to id the root cause. So far it hasn't been pretty but I've boiled > down to the following info. [.

Re: Looking for root cause of sig 11 on imapd

2001-07-05 Thread Scott Russell
Greets Again. Following up on my previous email I've now got a core file from cyrus 2.0.14. This comes from a sig 11 of imapd during auth from my previously posted hurtme.php script. My current config is listed in the previous email as well: [root@oggvorbis test1]# gdb /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd core