Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Dave O wrote: > > There is no 'move' command in the IMAP RFC iirc. A 'move' operation is > > just client side semantics for 'copy and then delete'. > > Then why not use the hard links (essentially the same as SIS delivery) for > IMAP copy? Well, for one, IMAP commands don't ha

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Dave O
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Scott Russell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step > > > operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and then > > > deleted from the source directo

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There is no 'move' command in the IMAP RFC iirc. A 'move' operation is > > just client side semantics for 'copy and then delete'. > > > > True. Dumb me :-) > > Perhaps it should be implemented ? :) This has been discussed on the IMAP list before, an

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread twk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and then deleted from the source directory. The copy operation fails bec

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread tosi
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step >> operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and >> then deleted from the source directory. The copy operation fails >> > because the user

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Scott Russell
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step > > operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and then > > deleted from the source directory. The copy operation fails > > because the user is

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread tosi
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Stefano Tabacchiera wrote: >> Hi all, >> my box is running cyrus-2.1.11 and I set up quota for my users. >> When someone is overquota, it's impossible to MOVE messages to Trash >> and then delete them. The only way is to NOT use Trash, mark messages >> a

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-01 Thread Scott Russell
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Stefano Tabacchiera wrote: > Hi all, > my box is running cyrus-2.1.11 and I set up quota for my users. > When someone is overquota, it's impossible to MOVE messages to Trash and > then delete them. The only way is to NOT use Trash, mark messages as > dele

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-01 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Stefano Tabacchiera wrote: > Hi all, > my box is running cyrus-2.1.11 and I set up quota for my users. > When someone is overquota, it's impossible to MOVE messages to Trash and > then delete them. The only way is to NOT use Trash, mark messages as > deleted and then expunge. >