Re: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-07 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Tarjei Huse wrote: > >I tried to extract some of the patches from different places and put > >them into my RPMs. Unfortunately I'm not sure I didn't miss one. > > Would it be possible to get the patches into the source soon? I would be > very happy to maybe have a commandline s

Re: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-05 Thread Tarjei Huse
Hi, I tried to extract some of the patches from different places and put them into my RPMs. Unfortunately I'm not sure I didn't miss one. Would it be possible to get the patches into the source soon? I would be very happy to maybe have a commandline sw --with-linux or something for the patches.

Re: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-05 Thread Simon Matter
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh schrieb: > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2003, Andrew Brink wrote: > > 1. ext2 or ext3, we are also considering a cluster solution using a > > shared File system (GFS) Any experiences with these? > > You're using Linux, then. Definately go with xfs or reiserfs. xfs is > probably

RE: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-04 Thread Richard Houston
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:13 PM >> To: Andrew Brink >> Cc: Cyrus Info list >> Subject: Re: Cyrus Server Migration >> >> >> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003, Andrew Brink wrote: >> > 1.

RE: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-04 Thread Andrew Brink
Perhaps you could tell me more about the linux stabilization patches? > -Original Message- > From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:13 PM > To: Andrew Brink > Cc: Cyrus Info list > Subject: Re: Cyrus Server Mi

Re: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-04 Thread Bennett Crowell
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 05:28:32 PM +0200 Jure Pecar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:01:33 -0500 "Andrew Brink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1. ext2 or ext3, we are also considering a cluster solution using a shared File system (GFS) Any experiences with these? reiserfs

Re: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-04 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003, Andrew Brink wrote: > 1. ext2 or ext3, we are also considering a cluster solution using a > shared File system (GFS) Any experiences with these? You're using Linux, then. Definately go with xfs or reiserfs. xfs is probably better for large sites, it is extremely fast and re

RE: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-04 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Andrew Brink wrote: > I think my original problem with DB 4, is that we were in a DB3 > environment, and then actually moved the mailboxes over to a DB4 > environment. > > I take it your using skiplist for mailboxes.db? Yes. > Do you know off the top of your head if the Verit

RE: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-04 Thread Andrew Brink
hanks > -Original Message- > From: Rob Siemborski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:25 AM > To: Andrew Brink > Cc: Cyrus Info list > Subject: Re: Cyrus Server Migration > > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Andrew Brink wrote: > > >

Re: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-04 Thread Jure Pecar
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:01:33 -0500 "Andrew Brink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. ext2 or ext3, we are also considering a cluster solution using a > shared File system (GFS) Any experiences with these? reiserfs or xfs. shared fs ... it's probably less painfull to just have shared storage that is

Re: Cyrus Server Migration

2003-09-04 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Andrew Brink wrote: > 2. db3 or db4? The previous server we have has some of the famous > locker problems and other db4 problems (we believe). Rob, maybe you can > bless the "official" db version to use. I am fine using db4, provided > that people are successfully using it i