> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:58:04 -0800 (PST),
> patl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (p) writes:
p> If this is true, you might want to look into replacing postfix with
p> exim. Exim is very easy to configure to handle this sort of thing.
For us it hasn't really been a problem. We seem to be somewha
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:45:46 +0100,
> Bruno Riedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (br) writes:
br> From my understanding, Postfix only evaluates aliases when doing local
br> delivery.
br> A transport map is no such thing, so You won't have Your aliases expanded.
All you have to do is use a virtual
On 11-Feb-01 at 15:23, Bruno Riedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You will run into new problems using a transport map for local lmtp
> delivery. From my understanding, Postfix only evaluates aliases when
> doing local delivery. A transport map is no such thing, so You won't
> have Your aliases ex
Another thing I forgot to mention - you might try linking lmtpd
static to reduce per-instance startup costs. (This may not be
an issue if setting prefork non-zero causes the lmtp daemon to
fork for each instance instead of the master forking and then
execing lmtpd.)
-Pat
ions are not too likely to come in near future
--
Bruno
- Original Message -
From: Amos Gouaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Question cyrus-imapd 2.0.11
> >>>>> On Sat, 10 F
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:44:32 -0500,
> Andy Hubbell, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ah) writes:
ah> Should the master process exec a new lmtpd for each delivery? This
ah> would seem somewhat wasteful, especially on a busy system with lots
ah> of disk IO... Nothing else is talking lmtp to this se
On 11-Feb-01 at 11:39, Andy Hubbell, Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm not seeing any evidence that postfix is batching up the local
> deliveries through a single lmtp instance... I've made some changed
> recommended by others using postfix, but still don't see evidence of this
> happening.
Pat,
I'm not seeing any evidence that postfix is batching up the local
deliveries through a single lmtp instance... I've made some changed
recommended by others using postfix, but still don't see evidence of this
happening... Not sure if its my postfix config or my cyrus config that's
causi
Amos,
Aha! The vital piece that I was missing! ;) I had set local_transport
and mailbox_transport and even fallback_transport in my attempts to get
this straight... So I'm assuming for my local domains I need to just put
the entry in a transport map for my local domains and it will use the
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:54:40 -0500,
> Andy Hubbell, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ah) writes:
ah> Christopher,
ah> Sorry to inform you, but since I am using a very recent snapshot
ah> of postfix it does support lmtp "out of the box" as it were.
ah> And as I stated in my email, I am using lmtp di
> The LMTP update for postfix is found on the download page at
> www.postfix.org under "Unofficial patches". I don't know how well it
> works. Alternately, if you want to go with production versions of software,
> sendmail has native support for LMTP in the recent releases. You could move
> the
On 10-Feb-01 at 14:07, Andy Hubbell, Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Christopher,
>
> Sorry to inform you, but since I am using a very recent snapshot of postfix
> it does support lmtp "out of the box" as it were. And as I stated in my
> email, I am using lmtp directly via the socket interface.
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 12:57:35PM -0500, Christopher Audley wrote:
> The LMTP update for postfix is found on the download page at www.postfix.org
> under "Unofficial patches". I don't know how well it works.
We are using snapshot 2000-12-17 which has LMTP support and had no problems
so far.
G
world of hurt in a week or two :-) Let me know how it
>goes, I'm anxious to find out.
>
>Cheers
>Chris
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Andy Hubbell, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:57:35 -0500,
> Christopher Audley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ca) writes:
ca> The LMTP update for postfix is found on the download page at www.postfix.org
ca> under "Unofficial patches". I don't know how well it works. Alternately,
Oh my, this is way out of date. Sim
f hurt in a week or two :-) Let me know how it
goes, I'm anxious to find out.
Cheers
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Hubbell, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:33 PM
Subject: Performance Question cyrus-i
Greetings,
Ok, time for another question... We are running a mail system (ISP) with just a bit
over 4000 mailboxes at present... Our exact configuration is as follows: RedHat
Linux 7.0 + patches, postfix snapshot 20010204 (MTA), and cyrus-imapd 2.0.11 system
is a dual PIII 800 with 512mb r
17 matches
Mail list logo
