Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-03 Thread Wesley Craig
On 03 Jul 2007, at 01:25, Janne Peltonen wrote: > I wonder where the mupdate process gets its fd limit from if it isn't > specified there. Does it inherit it from the shell that starts up > cyrus-master? Or is it set explicitely to some default value in > cyrus-master? I think cyrus-master may att

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-02 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:23:25PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote: > On 02 Jul 2007, at 06:53, Janne Peltonen wrote: > >But when try to imapsync the old server's data to the new one, with > >only > >one multi-threading mupdate master process, I keep getting 'connection > >to the master timed out' erro

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-02 Thread Wesley Craig
On 02 Jul 2007, at 06:53, Janne Peltonen wrote: > But when try to imapsync the old server's data to the new one, with > only > one multi-threading mupdate master process, I keep getting 'connection > to the master timed out' errors from the mupdate slaves. During your imapsync process, I might d

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-02 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:40:51PM +0200, Simon Matter wrote: > The patches between -4 and -7 are a cyrusdb_berkeley patch from CVS and > the pcreposix patch from FastMail.FM. I don't think they have any effect > in your situation, but maybe someone of FastMail.FM can tell you more. Yup, it was th

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-02 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:01:11AM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > ..the prefork numbers. Now this is something. I don't really know which one of > these is the one that matters, what is the resource that gets exhausted, why > it > gets exhausted etc. (and I sure as hope the problem only > manifes

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-07-01 Thread Simon Matter
> Hi! > > Using mutt, connecting via another backend, trying to create a folder > (ie. save a message to a new folder), result: > > imap_copy_messages [a0009 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox does not exist]? > > Connecting directly to the correct backend, result: > > Append messages to imaps://[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-06-30 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:11:56AM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > (Oh, the problem of not seeing the creation or deletion of mailboxes appears > to be > there still, even without the patches. To be more exact, the deletion problem > seems to be as follows: my client gets an acknowledgement that th

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-06-30 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:47:59PM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > The same goes with deletion: the mailboxes list of the proxying backend > (and, therefore, my client) sees doesn't get updated. Mm. When I restarted the system without the two patches (and run ctl_mboxlist and mupdate synch), there

Re: Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-06-30 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:47:59PM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > Restarting the mupdate master server causes all the slaves to > re-synchronize their mailboxes lists. (And this, in turn, generates > a substantial amount of write load.) And this seems to be the only way > to propagate the changes.

Remote mailbox creation error / unified murder

2007-06-30 Thread Janne Peltonen
Hi! Using mutt, connecting via another backend, trying to create a folder (ie. save a message to a new folder), result: imap_copy_messages [a0009 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox does not exist]? Connecting directly to the correct backend, result: Append messages to imaps://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.tataei

Re: Superior hiearchical mailbox creation, after the fact

2007-06-12 Thread Ross Boylan
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 08:49 -0400, Ken Murchison wrote: > Ross Boylan wrote: > > I've created INBOX.a.b, INBOX.a.c, and others. To my suprise, there is no > > INBOX.a folder. This was discussed previously on this list (2/28/06, > > similar > > to this messages subject), and is Cyrus's expected

Re: Superior hiearchical mailbox creation, after the fact

2007-05-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Ross Boylan wrote: I've created INBOX.a.b, INBOX.a.c, and others. To my suprise, there is no INBOX.a folder. This was discussed previously on this list (2/28/06, similar to this messages subject), and is Cyrus's expected behavior. I've now decided I want a folder INBOX.a, that is something I

Re: Superior hiearchical mailbox creation, after the fact

2007-05-29 Thread Jorey Bump
Ross Boylan wrote: I've created INBOX.a.b, INBOX.a.c, and others. To my suprise, there is no INBOX.a folder. This was discussed previously on this list (2/28/06, similar to this messages subject), and is Cyrus's expected behavior. I've now decided I want a folder INBOX.a, that is something I

Re: Superior hiearchical mailbox creation, after the fact

2007-05-29 Thread Zoran Kikic
Well, that's what i meant to say. I just thought amavis-new or sieve could cause problems without a physical existing "INBOX" directory but everything is fine so far. Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http:/

Re: Superior hiearchical mailbox creation, after the fact

2007-05-29 Thread Jorey Bump
Zoran Kikic wrote: I'm running Imapd 2.3.8+Postfix+SA+Amavis-New and everything works fine without INBOX folders - even my Sieve scripts: if header :contains "X-Spam-Flag" "YES" { fileinto "INBOX/Spam"; } There is NO INBOX but it works. Of course there's an INBOX. In IMAP, INBOX is virtual,

Re: Superior hiearchical mailbox creation, after the fact

2007-05-29 Thread Zoran Kikic
I'm running Imapd 2.3.8+Postfix+SA+Amavis-New and everything works fine without INBOX folders - even my Sieve scripts: if header :contains "X-Spam-Flag" "YES" { fileinto "INBOX/Spam"; } There is NO INBOX but it works. I've created INBOX.a.b, INBOX.a.c, and others. To my suprise, there is no

Superior hiearchical mailbox creation, after the fact

2007-05-28 Thread Ross Boylan
I've created INBOX.a.b, INBOX.a.c, and others. To my suprise, there is no INBOX.a folder. This was discussed previously on this list (2/28/06, similar to this messages subject), and is Cyrus's expected behavior. I've now decided I want a folder INBOX.a, that is something I can move messages i

[SOLVED] Re: Batch mailbox creation

2006-09-07 Thread Anders Norrbring
Anders Norrbring skrev: I know, this has been up quite some times, and I've seen quite a few small scripts and things to do batch creation of mailboxes, but just not the variant I need ATM. So, can somebody please help me out? I'm not really good at scripting, and definately not in perl. What

Re: Batch mailbox creation

2006-09-07 Thread jdavis
I have a script you could probably use as a starting point... Please contact me off list for details. Depending on your needs you will probably need to rip out some code as it also generates ldap samba accounts, creates home directories, etc... -Jeff On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:22:31 +0200, Ande

Re: Batch mailbox creation

2006-09-07 Thread Anders Norrbring
Anthony Tibbs skrev: This isn't thoroughly tested or anything, but you could use something like the following to generate a "command list" to be fed to cyradm, no? It doesn't check for things like the user already having a Spam mailboox, but... that wouldn't be hard to add. Is "-c" appropriat

Re: Batch mailbox creation

2006-09-07 Thread Anders Norrbring
Rudy Gevaert skrev: Hire a consoltant who can do it. Yeah. You're so kind. Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Re: Batch mailbox creation

2006-09-07 Thread Anthony Tibbs
This isn't thoroughly tested or anything, but you could use something like the following to generate a "command list" to be fed to cyradm, no? It doesn't check for things like the user already having a Spam mailboox, but... that wouldn't be hard to add. Is "-c" appropriate to prevent mailbox

Re: Batch mailbox creation

2006-09-07 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Anders Norrbring wrote: I know, this has been up quite some times, and I've seen quite a few small scripts and things to do batch creation of mailboxes, but just not the variant I need ATM. So, can somebody please help me out? I'm not really good at scripting, and definately not in perl. What

Re: Batch mailbox creation

2006-09-07 Thread Anders Norrbring
Superbiji skrev: try using spreadsheet tool like openoffice to generate script On 9/7/06, Anders Norrbring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know, this has been up quite some times, and I've seen quite a few small scripts and things to do batch creation of mailboxes, but just not the variant I need

Re: Batch mailbox creation

2006-09-07 Thread Superbiji
try using spreadsheet tool like openoffice to generate script On 9/7/06, Anders Norrbring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know, this has been up quite some times, and I've seen quite a few small scripts and things to do batch creation of mailboxes, but just not the variant I need ATM. So, can someb

Batch mailbox creation

2006-09-07 Thread Anders Norrbring
I know, this has been up quite some times, and I've seen quite a few small scripts and things to do batch creation of mailboxes, but just not the variant I need ATM. So, can somebody please help me out? I'm not really good at scripting, and definately not in perl. What I need to do is to creat

Re: Superior hierarchical mailbox creation....

2006-02-28 Thread Ken Murchison
nikhil BS wrote: Hi all, We are developing a client for IMAP server. I tried to create mailbox of the form x.y.z where '.' is the heirarchy separator. According to the RFC, -- If the server's hierarchy separator character appears elsewhere in the name, the server SHOULD create any superi

Superior hierarchical mailbox creation....

2006-02-28 Thread nikhil BS
Hi all, We are developing a client for IMAP server. I tried to create mailbox of the form x.y.z where '.' is the heirarchy separator. According to the RFC, -- If the server's hierarchy separator character appears elsewhere in   the name, the server SHOULD create any superior hierarchical names

Re: Batch mailbox creation

2006-02-19 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Martin Weil wrote: Hi there! I am implementing Cyrus with MySQL authentication for about 1,000 users. I am looking for a technique to create mailboxes for every user with a batch script. I read O'reillys "Managing Imap", and there is a batch script given, but i think it

Batch mailbox creation

2006-02-19 Thread Martin Weil
Hi there! I am implementing Cyrus with MySQL authentication for about 1,000 users. I am looking for a technique to create mailboxes for every user with a batch script. I read O'reillys "Managing Imap", and there is a batch script given, but i think it was designed for versions prior to Cyr

cyradm mailbox creation behaving differently if using CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5 auth

2004-12-31 Thread OpenMacNews
hi all, after building: cyrus-sasl-2.1.20 cyrus-imapd-2.2.10 w/ patches from http://email.uoa.gr/projects/cyrus/ cyrus-imapd-2.2.10-autocreate-0.1.diff cyrus-imapd-2.2.10-rmquota-0.1.diff cyrus-i

Mailbox creation

2004-05-24 Thread Kent L. Nasveschuk
I'm trying to set up the IMAP server so that the mail boxes are auto created. For authentication I'm using saslauthd that uses my OpenLDAP server. I can authenticate fine but the mailboxes don't seem to get created. This is my /etc/imapd.conf: configdirectory: /var/imap partition-default: /var/spo

Re: slow mailbox creation

2003-02-21 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:30:21 -0500 (EST) From: David A Powicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] This computer seems happy and fast in all respects, except for mailbox creations (4 seconds) and deletions (about 2 seconds) and ACL updates (2 seconds). A truss of an imapd that creates a

slow mailbox creation

2003-02-21 Thread David A Powicki
Salutations, We are seeing slow mailbox creation times and are

[Q] partition-balancing in mailbox creation

2002-10-28 Thread 원태환
Hi there, I am thinking of automatic partition-balancing when creating mailbox. As of date, partition information should be given as a parameter of cyradm, otherwise default partition is used. When growing the number of mailbox users and partitions, it is getting difficult to decide which partitio

Re: a question on cyrus-imap version 2.1 (mailbox creation)

2002-01-13 Thread Ken Murchison
¿øÅÂȯ wrote: > > Hi, > I am testing cyrus imap 2.1beta. > In the basic configuration, it works well. But, i found a different thing from the >other imap server. for example > MS Exchange Server. > > For example, MS Exchange server allows user to make a folder at the same level of >INBOX.

a question on cyrus-imap version 2.1 (mailbox creation)

2002-01-13 Thread 원태환
Hi, I am testing cyrus imap 2.1beta. In the basic configuration, it works well. But, i found a different thing from the other imap server. for example MS Exchange Server. For example, MS Exchange server allows user to make a folder at the same level of INBOX. So, client program (like outlook

Re: Mailbox creation

2001-07-26 Thread Prune
Jerome Fleury wrote: > I don't know if this is a Mulberry of Cyrus server related problem but > here it is: > > I'm running Cyrus Imap server 2.0.14, and I try to create a mailbox in > the top hierarchy (not in INBOX.*). Mulberry says Permission Denied > when I try to do so. > > I suppose

Re: Mailbox creation

2001-07-26 Thread Ken Murchison
Jerome Fleury wrote: > > I don't know if this is a Mulberry of Cyrus server related problem but here > it is: > > I'm running Cyrus Imap server 2.0.14, and I try to create a mailbox in the > top hierarchy (not in INBOX.*). Mulberry says Permission Denied when I try > to do so. > > I suppose i

Mailbox creation

2001-07-26 Thread Jerome Fleury
I don't know if this is a Mulberry of Cyrus server related problem but here it is: I'm running Cyrus Imap server 2.0.14, and I try to create a mailbox in the top hierarchy (not in INBOX.*). Mulberry says Permission Denied when I try to do so. I suppose it's a Cyrus related problem because I c

Re: Automating mailbox creation

2001-07-02 Thread Dietmar Rahlfs
TED]] Sent: Freitag, 29. Juni 2001 10:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Automating mailbox creation Hello, our cyrus-imapd server is using the NetWare NDS for user authentication. . .

RE: Automating mailbox creation

2001-06-29 Thread Daniel . Matuschek
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Freitag, 29. Juni 2001 10:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Automating mailbox creation Hello, our cyrus-imapd server is using the NetWare NDS for user authentication. It would be nice if -- after having added a new user to the NDS -- the cyrus IMAP mailbox would

Automating mailbox creation

2001-06-29 Thread Dietmar Rahlfs
Hello, our cyrus-imapd server is using the NetWare NDS for user authentication. It would be nice if -- after having added a new user to the NDS -- the cyrus IMAP mailbox would automatically be created after a successfull login of the new IMAP user. Is it possible to configure this in any way or

Re: Automatic mailbox creation

2000-12-03 Thread dannyman
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:15:56AM +1100, Stephen Fischer wrote: > I would prefer not to have sendmail do it, because it's a larger drain on the > resources and because it's not really sendmail's job to handle these things > (as I understand it). The reason for this is because at times the proces

Re: Automatic mailbox creation

2000-11-22 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:33:20 +1100 From: Stephen Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm interested in having the deliver program automatically create mailboxes when it receives a mail item addressed to an address of the correct format but which does not already exist. I found some

Re: Automatic mailbox creation

2000-11-21 Thread mills
Doesn't it make more sense to auto-create the mailbox the first time that the user reads mail from the IMAP server? At that point, the user will have been authenticated, so the mailbox name is valid. -- -Gary Mills--Unix Support--U of M Academic Computing and Networking-

Re: Automatic mailbox creation

2000-11-21 Thread Seva Adari
Stephen Fischer wrote: > I would prefer not to have sendmail do it, because it's a larger drain on the > resources and because it's not really sendmail's job to handle these things > (as I understand it). The reason for this is because at times the process > that informs us about new users takes

Re: Automatic mailbox creation

2000-11-20 Thread Stephen Fischer
I would prefer not to have sendmail do it, because it's a larger drain on the resources and because it's not really sendmail's job to handle these things (as I understand it). The reason for this is because at times the process that informs us about new users takes some time, so the users may be

Re: Automatic mailbox creation

2000-11-20 Thread Seva Adari
I have not done anything like what you are suggesting, but from what I know about sendmail, it ought to be possible to create automatic mailboxes. Requires some coding though! I am little curious to find out why would you want to be doing such a thing though! It can get you into resource related

Automatic mailbox creation

2000-11-20 Thread Stephen Fischer
I'm interested in having the deliver program automatically create mailboxes when it receives a mail item addressed to an address of the correct format but which does not already exist. I found some mail in the archive from people asking a similar question but no answers. Is this capability there