Re: Mail status

2002-05-23 Thread Gary Mills
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:50:06AM +0100, Russell Packer wrote: > > Ow. Well thats totally broken things... > > [cyrus@mailfish cyrus-tools]$ ./rehash -f full > converting configuration directory /var/imap...user quota done > converting /usr/sieve... > fatal error: couldn't move cyrus back! > co

RE: Mail status

2002-05-23 Thread Russell Packer
> -Original Message- > From: Gary Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 May 2002 19:25 > To: Scott M Likens > Cc: Luca Olivetti; Russell Packer; Info Cyrus > Subject: Re: Mail status > > > On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:42:56AM -0600, Scott M Likens wrote: &g

Re: Mail status

2002-05-22 Thread Carsten Burghardt
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 23:50, Luca Olivetti wrote: > Luca Olivetti wrote: > > Now I switched to using skiplist instead of flat for the seen database > > and so far it works, but who knows, maybe in a couple of days it'll > > break again. > > Didn't have to wait that long :-( > Just saw a couple

Re: Mail status

2002-05-22 Thread Luca Olivetti
Luca Olivetti wrote: > Now I switched to using skiplist instead of flat for the seen database > and so far it works, but who knows, maybe in a couple of days it'll > break again. Didn't have to wait that long :-( Just saw a couple of seen messages reappear as unseen. -- Luca Olivetti

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Gary Mills
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:35:45PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote: > > Its been so long since I committed your patches, I don't remember how > this stuff works (or is documented). Is the improved hash stuff only > available as an 'upgrade' via rehash, or can it be used right out of the > box on a fr

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Ken Murchison
Thanks. I'll make sure that I update the correct docs. Ken Gary Mills wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:35:45PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > > Its been so long since I committed your patches, I don't remember how > > this stuff works (or is documented). Is the improved hash stuff on

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Gary Mills
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:42:56AM -0600, Scott M Likens wrote: > Actually I found the hash incorrect for both sieve and cyrus in the > user/quota directory's. > > What i did is patch'd the mkimap and dohash scripts. > > Attached you'll find what i did, i implemented a FULL hash and found that

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Ken Murchison
Gary Mills wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:42:56AM -0600, Scott M Likens wrote: > > Actually I found the hash incorrect for both sieve and cyrus in the > > user/quota directory's. > > > > What i did is patch'd the mkimap and dohash scripts. > > > > Attached you'll find what i did, i imple

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Luca Olivetti
Scott M Likens wrote: > Attached you'll find what i did, i implemented a FULL hash and found > that the directory's created by the scripts were in-adequite for my > needs, and cyrus couldnt handle it. I'm using the "traditional" hash here, so I don't think that it's the problem. I revised my

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Scott M Likens
Actually I found the hash incorrect for both sieve and cyrus in the user/quota directory's. What i did is patch'd the mkimap and dohash scripts. Attached you'll find what i did, i implemented a FULL hash and found that the directory's created by the scripts were in-adequite for my needs, and

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Luca Olivetti
Russell Packer wrote: > Hi, > > I get strange behaviour using Microsoft Outlook - the status for various > e-mail messages seems to change rather randomly. I will mark messages as > being read, then 5/10 minutes later they will suddenly be marked as 'unread' > (IMAP). Others in the company have r

Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Russell Packer
Hi, I get strange behaviour using Microsoft Outlook - the status for various e-mail messages seems to change rather randomly. I will mark messages as being read, then 5/10 minutes later they will suddenly be marked as 'unread' (IMAP). Others in the company have remarked upon it as well. Has anyo