Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Dave O wrote: > > There is no 'move' command in the IMAP RFC iirc. A 'move' operation is > > just client side semantics for 'copy and then delete'. > > Then why not use the hard links (essentially the same as SIS delivery) for > IMAP copy? Well, for one, IMAP commands don't ha

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Dave O
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Scott Russell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step > > > operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and then > > > deleted from the source directo

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There is no 'move' command in the IMAP RFC iirc. A 'move' operation is > > just client side semantics for 'copy and then delete'. > > > > True. Dumb me :-) > > Perhaps it should be implemented ? :) This has been discussed on the IMAP list before, an

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread twk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and then deleted from the source directory. The copy operation fails bec

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread tosi
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step >> operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and >> then deleted from the source directory. The copy operation fails >> > because the user

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread Scott Russell
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:17:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This has come up before. The move command is actually a two step > > operation where the file is first copied to the 'Trash' folder and then > > deleted from the source directory. The copy operation fails > > because the user is

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-02 Thread tosi
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Stefano Tabacchiera wrote: >> Hi all, >> my box is running cyrus-2.1.11 and I set up quota for my users. >> When someone is overquota, it's impossible to MOVE messages to Trash >> and then delete them. The only way is to NOT use Trash, mark messages >> a

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-01 Thread Scott Russell
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Stefano Tabacchiera wrote: > Hi all, > my box is running cyrus-2.1.11 and I set up quota for my users. > When someone is overquota, it's impossible to MOVE messages to Trash and > then delete them. The only way is to NOT use Trash, mark messages as > dele

Re: Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-01 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Stefano Tabacchiera wrote: > Hi all, > my box is running cyrus-2.1.11 and I set up quota for my users. > When someone is overquota, it's impossible to MOVE messages to Trash and > then delete them. The only way is to NOT use Trash, mark messages as > deleted and then expunge. >

Impossible to move messages to trash when overquota

2003-01-01 Thread Stefano Tabacchiera
Hi all, my box is running cyrus-2.1.11 and I set up quota for my users. When someone is overquota, it's impossible to MOVE messages to Trash and then delete them. The only way is to NOT use Trash, mark messages as deleted and then expunge. Question is: why ??? Is there a workaround for this? Almo