On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 01:13, Kevin Baker wrote:
> On the "real" scsi hard RAID, I agree but...
>
> For those of us currently using Managed hosting, IDE
> drives might be the only option up front. While hardware
> RAID and SCSI are with out a doubt *much* better...
> the following makes sense to me
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Kevin Baker wrote:
- Aren't 2 cheap serv's w/ HA better than one
better server as a single point of failure?
Before the Aggregator support, splitting a userbase between servers was
very difficult if you had any shared mailboxes. Now that there is the
aggregator support , it
On the "real" scsi hard RAID, I agree but...
For those of us currently using Managed hosting, IDE
drives might be the only option up front. While hardware
RAID and SCSI are with out a doubt *much* better...
the following makes sense to me:
- IDE soft RAID server handles 3000 users NP
- it slows a
Just posting this for a heads up. Not a question, just info.
We just switched from "Cyrus deliver" to "LMTP" transport.
from: mail_transport=cyrus
to: mail_transport=lmtp
Once we reached about 600 user we were having problems with:
- corrupt mailboxes (needed to be reconstructed)
- cyrus deliver
