Hi,
--On Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004 15:45 Uhr +0200 Tom Bryntesen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And finally - if I may ask - What type of SAN do you have as shared
medium for those two
dell's?
we have a Cisco/IBM solution based on 3 IBM FastT600Turbo and a Cisco MDS
9509, giving us around 56 TB of
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:24:00 +0200
Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We now have a SAN and have been very happy with it. I suppose a
> FibreChannel RAID
> delivers the same benefits.
I've had no problems with clustering software on AS 2.1, but i've had major
problems with fiber sto
Hi,
--On Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004 13:27 Uhr +0200 Simon Matter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think you'll have any problems with one server. Just make sure you
have fast disks since IO is most important here. I know people are using
cyrus-imapd on RedHat AS cluster but I don't know how wel
> OK. thanks
>
> Well, re. concurrent connections, it's hard to tell, but if I guess that
> about 5000 users
I just wanted to say that people should not forget that you can't compare
corporate usage with things like a university. I usually expect the
concurrent user connections to be 50-75% of the
OK. thanks
Well, re. concurrent connections, it's hard to tell, but if I guess that
about 5000 users
are checking their mail-boxes approximately at the same time ? ...
mailbox sizes are
not specified yet, but I'll guess that 50 Megs should do, because the
users are for the
most part POP3 users.
Hi list.
We are looking into the possibility of setting up the Cyrus IMAP Aggregator
(http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/ag.html) for a company. They have about
10.000 mail-boxes and a single domain. We are looking for a solution
that doesn't
create traffic bottle-necks, has 24/7 up-time and hardware fa
