Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

Hi Earl, Not sure if our messages crossed, so I repeat some below if I was not clear before. The key advantage to my hack is that quota behaviour is the same as normal except for one key exception, users can copy to Trash when over quota.They can not append or copy to other mailboxes or app

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

Hi Christian, There is no particular reason why you could not use this with unixhierarchysep, just substitute the  "/"  (slash) for the "."(period) in the substring function.  Note that this was tested in 2.0.16, the exact location in index.c might be different in later versions.   Also check

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

The solution I came up with was to hack cyrus to use the ignore quota mechanism (normally used by lmtpd) when copying to INBOX.Trash.(Just a couple of lines of code see the diff below) I know Rob doesn't like this solution and it is a security risk, since a malicious user could fill up a Trash

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2003 01:12 schrieb John Wade: > diff index.c index.c.org > 1220,1228c1220 > < /* next lines changed to allow copy to Trash when usr over quota */ > < /* jwidera jwade 6/27/03 lets users "move to Trash" when over quota */ > < > < if ( strstr(name,".Trash") ) { >

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

Rob Siemborski said: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: > >> What happens when I create a sub of inbox. What quota does apply to that >> sub or does the sub has no quota? >> >> according the rfc: >>Each mailbox has zero or more implementation-defined named "quota >>roots". E

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: > What happens when I create a sub of inbox. What quota does apply to that > sub or does the sub has no quota? > > according the rfc: >Each mailbox has zero or more implementation-defined named "quota >roots". Each quota root has zero or mor

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: > Ideal situation would be that the QUOTA extension is rewritten in order to > set individual QUOTA on children mailboxes of QUOTAROOT so you can set the > INBOX.Trash QUOTA to unlimited and still have QUOTA enabled on INBOX and > the other children

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

> according the rfc: >Each mailbox has zero or more implementation-defined named "quota >roots". Each quota root has zero or more resource limits. All >mailboxes that share the same named quota root share the resource >limits of the quota root. > > that make me think that INBOX an

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

Andrew Morgan said: > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: > >> Andre Nicholson said: >> > I run into this problem **all of the time** with my users. What's >> > happening, if you use >> > a Trash folder, is that the message is first /copied/ to the Trash >> folder >> > and then if >

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: > Andre Nicholson said: > > I run into this problem **all of the time** with my users. What's > > happening, if you use > > a Trash folder, is that the message is first /copied/ to the Trash folder > > and then if > > successful the original messag

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

Andre Nicholson said: > I run into this problem **all of the time** with my users. What's > happening, if you use > a Trash folder, is that the message is first /copied/ to the Trash folder > and then if > successful the original message is deleted. Why isn't it just moved?? Is > it SquirrelMail >

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

I run into this problem **all of the time** with my users. What's happening, if you use a Trash folder, is that the message is first /copied/ to the Trash folder and then if successful the original message is deleted. Why isn't it just moved?? Is it SquirrelMail or Cyrus that's the cause? Having

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, joe ritter wrote: > Could not complete request. > Reason Given: Over quota > > This is an odd catch 22 situation. I wanted to see if > anybody had experienced this before and what they > were able to do to fix this. You need to not use a trash mailbox, which doesn't work ter

Re: Could not complete request over quota errors

joe ritter wrote: Hello, We had a migration here a couple of weeks ago from a UW Imap setup to Cyrus. The old UW Imap setup was not enforcing any quotas. We have a handful of users who had mail folders migrated that were larger than the new defauult quota for mailboxes. When these users log in via

Could not complete request over quota errors

Hello, We had a migration here a couple of weeks ago from a UW Imap setup to Cyrus. The old UW Imap setup was not enforcing any quotas. We have a handful of users who had mail folders migrated that were larger than the new defauult quota for mailboxes. When these users log in via squirrelmail and