Aleksandar Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Note that using "Trash-like" folder on IMAP server is not good idea.
Not necessarily. I wrote a "user creation" script which makes the
standard mailboxes, including Trash, and sets a 14-day expiry for
Trash.
I explain the behavior to each use
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
We recently deployed Cyrus IMAPD on an internal corporate server.
We plan on using it for a larger installation (once I get comfortable
with all the technical quirks ;-))
In any case, an issue was brought up whereby if a user doesn't "Compact"
their mailbox (done via most
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
I'm concerned about disk space consumption of these messages in-limbo.
Is there some mechanism that can force a "compact" of the mailbox to
remove these deleted messages - or is there another method to manage
this scenario?
Use quotas as a LART. http://www.catb.org/~esr/
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 19:30 -0500, David G Mcmurtrie wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>
> > In any case, an issue was brought up whereby if a user doesn't "Compact"
> > their mailbox (done via most common MUA's like Thunderbird) the deleted
> > messages can linger - for however
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> In any case, an issue was brought up whereby if a user doesn't "Compact"
> their mailbox (done via most common MUA's like Thunderbird) the deleted
> messages can linger - for however long.
>
> I've personally seen this before.
The IMAP protocol specif
We recently deployed Cyrus IMAPD on an internal corporate server.
We plan on using it for a larger installation (once I get comfortable
with all the technical quirks ;-))
In any case, an issue was brought up whereby if a user doesn't "Compact"
their mailbox (done via most common MUA's like Thund
