Chuck Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And how about combining those two:
>
> 3) Rename master. Postfix has a "master" process also meaning I can't
> read the Cyrus man page (yeah big deal). But something more
> descriptive like "cyrus" would be better..
>
well, at least for Red Hat Linu
Chuck Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And how about combining those two:
>
> 3) Rename master. Postfix has a "master" process also meaning I can't
> read the Cyrus man page (yeah big deal). But something more
> descriptive like "cyrus" would be better..
Yes, I forgot to mention that conf
Wrote Cillian Sharkey on Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 07:54:32PM +:
> Just two small (trivial) suggestions:
>
> 1) Rename quota command (and manpage) to cyrquota to prevent conflict with
>existing system disk quota command. The FreeBSD port of Cyrus IMAPD does
>this.
>
> 2) Make the master p
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>
> It appears that searching the body of messages with whitespace is
> broken; this is a general bug affecting Cyrus and not just the
> archive.* folders on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu.
>
> I haven't tracked down the problem yet.
See bug #55. This goes back to a big can
It appears that searching the body of messages with whitespace is
broken; this is a general bug affecting Cyrus and not just the
archive.* folders on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu.
I haven't tracked down the problem yet.
Larry
Date:Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:27:19 -0700
From: Devin Reade <[EMAIL
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:42:13 +
From: Ross Golder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Surely, a searchable web-based front-end isn't that hard to set-up?
We've been experimenting with a web-based front-end at
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/
We're not entirely happy with the technology yet
Devin Reade wrote:
>
> It's good that this list has been archived, however it its
> current form it's not very usable. With over 8000 messages
> in one folder, it's not feasible to find something without
> using server-side search capabilities, however those seem
> to be disabled. (I tried sear
David Bosso pointed out in private email that the 8000 message folder
was likely the uw-imap mailing list, not this one. Yes, the 8000 count
was for that list, but this one is close.
He also mentioned that his searches were working fine. Curious, I went
back and did some further searches. A bi
> Don't forget that with the current 8000 message mailbox scheme,
> you're talking about 8000 files in one directory. You are almost
*barring* the server side search issue..
8000 messages in one folder's nothing. I regularly have 20,000-30,000
messages, both on a heavy peice of machinary at wo
Sounds to me like the hashing function could
be implemented as a sieve script when mail
gets delivered to the mailbox.
I have used the web archive at:
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/
and it is also difficult to us as an archival
search engine. Perhaps breaking it up into years
would be helpful
10 matches
Mail list logo
