Re: Security of Cyrus IMAPd vs UofW IMAPd ...

2001-03-14 Thread patl
On 14-Mar-01 at 09:00, The Hermit Hacker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Trying to convince a group that Cyrus is more secure, but my arguments are > about as lame as can be :( I assume that you've pointed out that no exploits have ever been reported for Cyrus and that even if an exploit is ever

Re: deliver and lmtpd

2001-02-13 Thread patl
On 13-Feb-01 at 14:49, Werner Reisberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:06:12AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > It's written in the upgrade notice, that deliver is only a wrapper to > > > the lmtp server and that a lmtp client is required. > > > > This is NOT true. Del

Re: deliver and lmtpd

2001-02-13 Thread patl
On 13-Feb-01 at 02:45, Werner Reisberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Quoting Mobeen Azhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I have not been able to use deliver since I upgraded from 1.5 to 2.x. > > and > > had to revert to using sieve. > > It's written in the upgrade notice, that deliver is only a wra

Re: Performance Question cyrus-imapd 2.0.11

2001-02-11 Thread patl
On 11-Feb-01 at 15:23, Bruno Riedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > You will run into new problems using a transport map for local lmtp > delivery. From my understanding, Postfix only evaluates aliases when > doing local delivery. A transport map is no such thing, so You won't > have Your aliases ex

Re: Performance Question cyrus-imapd 2.0.11

2001-02-11 Thread patl
Another thing I forgot to mention - you might try linking lmtpd static to reduce per-instance startup costs. (This may not be an issue if setting prefork non-zero causes the lmtp daemon to fork for each instance instead of the master forking and then execing lmtpd.) -Pat

Re: Performance Question cyrus-imapd 2.0.11

2001-02-11 Thread patl
On 11-Feb-01 at 11:39, Andy Hubbell, Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I'm not seeing any evidence that postfix is batching up the local > deliveries through a single lmtp instance... I've made some changed > recommended by others using postfix, but still don't see evidence of this > happening.

Re: Performance Question cyrus-imapd 2.0.11

2001-02-10 Thread patl
> The LMTP update for postfix is found on the download page at > www.postfix.org under "Unofficial patches". I don't know how well it > works. Alternately, if you want to go with production versions of software, > sendmail has native support for LMTP in the recent releases. You could move > the

Re: Performance Question cyrus-imapd 2.0.11

2001-02-10 Thread patl
On 10-Feb-01 at 14:07, Andy Hubbell, Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Christopher, > > Sorry to inform you, but since I am using a very recent snapshot of postfix > it does support lmtp "out of the box" as it were. And as I stated in my > email, I am using lmtp directly via the socket interface.

Re: building 2.0.9

2000-12-23 Thread patl
On 23-Dec-00 at 08:41, GOMBAS Gabor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:26:42PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdmibs.so: undefined reference to `auto_nlist_value' > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdmibs.so: undefined reference to `kvm_getswapinfo' > > > /u

Re: building 2.0.9

2000-12-23 Thread patl
On 22-Dec-00 at 21:39, Ilya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > you were correct, that fixed it. but now i am stuck in a new place... any > ideas? ;) > make all CFLAGS=-O > ### Making all in /root/temp/cyrus-imapd-2.0.9/man > ### Making all in /root/temp/cyrus-imapd-2.0.9/sieve > ### Making all in /root/

Re: building 2.0.9

2000-12-22 Thread patl
On 21-Dec-00 at 21:04, Ilya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I am trying to build 2.0.9 on a freebsd 4.2 and i am getting this error, > any ideas? : > > rusdb_db3.c > cyrusdb_db3.c:75: syntax error before `*' > cyrusdb_db3.c:75: warning: data definition has no type or storage class Look at this line