d only
getting one reply, that's correct. It should only respond once to a
given address until :days (in your case, 9) days go by without an email
from that user. See
<http://www.process.com/techsupport/pmdf/sieve/draft-showalter-sieve-vacation-01.html>.
--
Scott Lamb
t collect2: ld returned 1 exit
>> status
--
Scott Lamb
./configure --with-auth=unix --disable-cyradm --with-dbdir=
where is where the Berkeley DB port is installed on your system.
It's been a while since I've used OpenBSD, look through your installed
ports list to figure out where that is.
--
Scott Lamb
eply. I'd already gotten the message quite clearly that
my approach was not liked. It's good to see someone who also took the
time to read what I was trying to accomplish. If you have any more
specific suggestions, I'd be glad to hear them. (Though they would
probably be off-topic here.)
--
Scott Lamb
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 07:32:25AM +0200, Birger Toedtmann wrote:
> Mmmhhh. Isn't this a very dangerous thing to do to the cyrus system?
> Not the idea as such but their implcations: I imagine a slow/broken DNS
> and 100+ incoming mails/min. I imagine a system with thousands of half-
> hanging
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:23:56PM +0800, damm wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:27:10PM -0500, Scott Lamb wrote:
>
> > Scott M Likens wrote:
> >
> > If you have some idea how I could accomplish my stated goals on the MTA
> > side, please share. I've give
' instead of outright blocking spams. With something purely
on the MTA side, this isn't possible at all - Cyrus is what decides
where the mail gets filed. This is possible with the X-RBL-Warning, but
I've pretty thoroughly stated why I think that's inadequate. I won't
repeat myself.
--
Scott Lamb
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:45:33PM +0200, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:39:07PM -0500, Scott Lamb wrote:
>
> > I started by making a patch to Postfix that would just add the
> > "X-RBL-Warning" header as some other MTAs do.
>
> IMHO think th
Ken Murchison wrote:
>Scott Lamb wrote:
>
>
>>I'm trying to create a Realtime Blackhole List extension to Sieve, so I can do
>>
>>
>
>Doesn't functionality like this belong in the MTA?
>
>
The problem with doing it in the MTA is control.
on available in the Received: header:
Received: from helohost (dnslookup [ip.address.literal])
by thishost (Postfix) with ESMTP id whatever
but I do not think this is true of all servers. Should I just grab the first
"Received" header and see if the information I need is present? Should I
extend LMTP with a command to indicate the SMTP client?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks!
--
Scott Lamb
10 matches
Mail list logo
