On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:23:56PM +0800, damm wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:27:10PM -0500, Scott Lamb wrote: > > > Scott M Likens wrote: > > > > If you have some idea how I could accomplish my stated goals on the MTA > > side, please share. I've given my reasons for this approach. Why do you > > feel so strongly that this belongs in the MTA?
[...] > Pretty much i have a strong feeling about it, i know you loose emails from > using rbl_check's and from bodychecks and headerchecks. But honestly i > have learned along time ago, if you arnt willing to make the choices and > take the matters into your own hands. You will never be rid of the > problem. You feel it's acceptable to occasionally lose important mail to heuristics. I feel otherwise. This really reinforces my belief that per-user UCE rules are important. Now, if you know of a good way to accomplish that in the MTA, I'd love to hear it. Otherwise, I'm not interested in your postfix configuration, and I doubt the rest of the info-cyrus list is either. > and personally i feel if you dont take it out at the MTA level, your going > to make it use extra cpu power to add it to INBOX.spam and whatever other > Sieve rulesets you might use. So essentially your reason for wanting this in the MTA boils down to CPU usage? Interesting, I'm not sure how much of a problem this is for people. (I do know, though, you should probably not be using bodychecks. They are not efficient, particularly with large messages. See the recent threads about them on postfix-users.) -- Scott Lamb
