Re: LTMPD rejecting large messages, maxmessagesize is _not_ set

2007-07-12 Thread Chris St. Pierre
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Roberto R. Morelli wrote: > Look at the postfix config (main.cf). The value to look at is > "message_size_limit". Had the same problem long time ago. > > Mine is set to "message_size_limit = 51200" Which is email size of 512MB > (folks here use email like ftp .) T

Re: quota warning in message

2007-07-12 Thread Michael Menge
Hi, the quotawarn feature will not send an email, but will notify the imap client, so that the warning will popup. We have written a script that will send an email to the user if they have more than 60% of there quota and an final mail if they are over quota. The script uses the quota and

quota warning in message

2007-07-12 Thread Philippe Trolliet
hi, i´m using cyrus-imapd on fedora core 6. i want to send a mail to the user whose quota is over "quotawarn:"-parameter in imapd.conf. i always thought that the quotawarn parameter itself will enable such a feature but no mail is sent. how can i notify the user per mail if his quota is over "quota

Re: RAID type suggestion

2007-07-12 Thread Rob Mueller
Just some thoughts 1. Simon is right about RAID-5 being unreliable. Either use RAID-6 or replication to a completely separate system to ensure you have enough redundancy 2. Look at having separate RAID-1 for OS AND cyrus meta data, and RAID-5+replication or RAID-6 for the data spool >From our

Re: "re-singleinstancestore" a partition?

2007-07-12 Thread Simon Matter
> I need a sanity check here. > > I had a single storage partition that I've grown to ~400GB to house > about 270,000 mailboxes. I managed to reduce that number by around > 115,000 by purging out accounts no one's logged into, still leaving > quite a mess of accounts. I've been migrating them wit

Re: RAID type suggestion

2007-07-12 Thread Simon Matter
> Hello, > > We have a low-end platform of using Core2duo (Xeon) with 4G ram. > The budget is not much enough to afford SAN. > We consider SAS finally, but are still having concerns about mail access > speed. > > This RAID could be: > 1. RAID 1 (OS) + RAID 1 (mail spool) > 2. RAID 1 (OS) + RAID 5 (