Re: Sieve RBL extension?

2002-04-25 Thread Scott Lamb
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 07:32:25AM +0200, Birger Toedtmann wrote: > Mmmhhh. Isn't this a very dangerous thing to do to the cyrus system? > Not the idea as such but their implcations: I imagine a slow/broken DNS > and 100+ incoming mails/min. I imagine a system with thousands of half- > hanging

Re: default port of sieve

2002-04-25 Thread Simon Matter
Luc de Louw schrieb: > > Hi! > > I got a maybe dumb question: > > which is the default port for sieve? > > Since SuSE 8.0 in /etc/services is defined as the sieve port. > > the php-sieve lib uses 2000. > > Which is correct? SuSE or php-sieve? > > thanks a lot > > rgds > > Luc Sieve

Re: Sieve + RBL = SICK!

2002-04-25 Thread Scott Lamb
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:23:56PM +0800, damm wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:27:10PM -0500, Scott Lamb wrote: > > > Scott M Likens wrote: > > > > If you have some idea how I could accomplish my stated goals on the MTA > > side, please share. I've given my reasons for this approach. Why do

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

2002-04-25 Thread Birger Toedtmann
Scott Lamb schrieb am Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:12:52PM -0500: > I'm trying to create a Realtime Blackhole List extension to Sieve, so I can do > stuff like this: > > require ["fileinto", "x-rbl", "x-rbl-reject"]; > > if header :contains ["to","cc","bcc"] "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" { > file

Re: Sieve + RBL = SICK!

2002-04-25 Thread damm
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:27:10PM -0500, Scott Lamb wrote: > Scott M Likens wrote: > > If you have some idea how I could accomplish my stated goals on the MTA > side, please share. I've given my reasons for this approach. Why do you > feel so strongly that this belongs in the MTA? Because it

Re: Sieve + RBL = SICK!

2002-04-25 Thread Birger Toedtmann
Scott Lamb schrieb am Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:27:10PM -0500: > Scott M Likens wrote: > > >This is quite Sickening, RBL is a MTA implementation not needed to be > >done via Sieve, and as for spamassasin you can always write decent > >header checks and body checks for postfix to use. I am sure t

Re: Sieve + RBL = SICK!

2002-04-25 Thread Scott Lamb
Scott M Likens wrote: > This is quite Sickening, RBL is a MTA implementation not needed to be > done via Sieve, and as for spamassasin you can always write decent > header checks and body checks for postfix to use. I am sure there is > the same option in sendmail. If you have some idea how

Sieve + RBL = SICK!

2002-04-25 Thread Scott M Likens
Now i know i RARELY ever post messages but i'll be quite honest. This is quite Sickening, RBL is a MTA implementation not needed to be done via Sieve, and as for spamassasin you can always write decent header checks and body checks for postfix to use. I am sure there is the same option in sen

cyrus sieve authentication imapd-2.1.3

2002-04-25 Thread Kalpit Jain
Hi, I have IMAPD-2.1.3 my RH7.2 system. I am using LDap as my authentication usinng PAM my /etc/imapd.conf says: # less /etc/imapd.conf configdirectory: /var/imap partition-default: /var/spool/imap admins: cyrus allowanonymouslogin: no # To use th

Cyrus Notes & Scripts

2002-04-25 Thread Wil Cooley
I just did an install and migration over the last few days, and had to write a few scripts to accomplish it. I thought I'd put up my notes on my Wiki and my scripts so others might have an easier time (and so I won't forget next time ;). You can see my notes and links to my scripts at: http://n

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

2002-04-25 Thread Scott Lamb
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:45:33PM +0200, GOMBAS Gabor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:39:07PM -0500, Scott Lamb wrote: > > > I started by making a patch to Postfix that would just add the > > "X-RBL-Warning" header as some other MTAs do. > > IMHO think this is the Right Thing(TM). IMNSHO

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

2002-04-25 Thread GOMBAS Gabor
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:39:07PM -0500, Scott Lamb wrote: > I started by making a patch to Postfix that would just add the > "X-RBL-Warning" header as some other MTAs do. IMHO think this is the Right Thing(TM). > It's more likely to get > into graphical Sieve generators this way. I'd never

default port of sieve

2002-04-25 Thread Luc de Louw
Hi! I got a maybe dumb question: which is the default port for sieve? Since SuSE 8.0 in /etc/services is defined as the sieve port. the php-sieve lib uses 2000. Which is correct? SuSE or php-sieve? thanks a lot rgds Luc

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

2002-04-25 Thread Bob Finch
> "Scott" == Scott Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Scott> My question: How do I find out the SMTP client's IP Scott> address? I hoped to see this in the envelope stuff, but I Scott> don't. Nothing else seems to use it. I know Postfix makes Scott> this information available in

Re: subfolders

2002-04-25 Thread Yuri Pimenov
On Thursday 25 April 2002 22:17, Ingo Herz wrote: the details: cyrus 2.0.16 exim 4.02 and the filter i crafted after some diggings in the list: # Exim filter if error_message then finish endif if $header_List-Id: contains "exim-users.exim.org" then deliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] elif $header_List-Id

Re: using spam control tools

2002-04-25 Thread Bob Finch
> "Jeremy" == Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeremy> Neat. Our approach is to use a Postfix content filter. It Jeremy> checks the recipients against a DB to see if anyone have Jeremy> spam protection turned on, and if one does then it adds Jeremy> the SpamAssassin h

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

2002-04-25 Thread Scott Lamb
Ken Murchison wrote: >Scott Lamb wrote: > > >>I'm trying to create a Realtime Blackhole List extension to Sieve, so I can do >> >> > >Doesn't functionality like this belong in the MTA? > > The problem with doing it in the MTA is control. End users do not control their MTA, but they may

Re: subfolders

2002-04-25 Thread Ingo Herz
At 22:02 24.04.2002 +0400, Yuri Pimenov wrote: could you tell us more about your config: cyrus version, delivery meth, MTA etc. If you use sendmail/lmtp I think direct delivery will be impossible if you enable ".forward". ingo >hi! > >is it possible to deliver messages right into subfolder in u

"spam" sieve extension

2002-04-25 Thread Bob Finch
I've gotten a handful of requests for the "spam" sieve extension I mentioned yesterday. The diffs aren't too big, so I'll post them to the list. The diffs add a test to sieve that passes the message to SpamAssassin. If SpamAssassin scores the messages as spam, the test fails, otherwise the test

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

2002-04-25 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Lamb wrote: > > I'm trying to create a Realtime Blackhole List extension to Sieve, so I can do Doesn't functionality like this belong in the MTA? -- Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd. Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place 716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127 --PGP Publ

Sieve RBL extension?

2002-04-25 Thread Scott Lamb
I'm trying to create a Realtime Blackhole List extension to Sieve, so I can do stuff like this: require ["fileinto", "x-rbl", "x-rbl-reject"]; if header :contains ["to","cc","bcc"] "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" { fileinto "INBOX"; } elsif x-rbl :types ["127.0.0.2", "127.0.0.4", "127.0.