Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Igor Brezac
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > Chris Audley wrote: > > > > No, it will not work. A shared file system with unix lock semantics is > > not enough, Berkeley DB will not work in this environment because it > > uses shared memory. The system is single host bound. > > Yup. Good ca

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Chris Audley wrote: > > No, it will not work. A shared file system with unix lock semantics is > not enough, Berkeley DB will not work in this environment because it > uses shared memory. The system is single host bound. Yup. Good call. This could be worked around or just use non-BDB cyrus

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread alex
Hmm, I think there's a way to persuade berkeleydb to work without shm. Not sure tho -alex On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Chris Audley wrote: > No, it will not work. A shared file system with unix lock semantics is > not enough, Berkeley DB will not work in this environment because it > uses shar

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Chris Audley
No, it will not work. A shared file system with unix lock semantics is not enough, Berkeley DB will not work in this environment because it uses shared memory. The system is single host bound. Cheers Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >So you think if i simply had cxfs, it would work w/o proble

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Gene Rackow
I have no idea if it will or not. My experience with shared disk solutions is that very fwe packages or even operating systems work well with them when you put them under load. For anything critical, I would not use a shared disks solution. I'm sorry if you took it to mean that it would work. It

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Konrads . Smelkovs
So, the only problem is filesystem? If cyrus is trained to handle multiple imap processes and more important multiple lmtpd. |-+> | | Gene Rackow | | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | ov> | |

Re: Freebsd 4.5 and cyrus-2.1.3

2002-03-19 Thread Bob Finch
> "Arley" == arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Arley> I ran into this problem trying to build cyrus 2.1.3 on Arley> Freebsd-4.5 p2. Anybody has anybody had any better success Arley> than I ? Here's the changes I made to get it to build on FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE: diff -c -r cyrus-im

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread alex
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ken Murchison wrote: > The Cyrus code already handles the locking between multiple processes, > so an imapd running on a different box is a subtle (if any) difference, > provided that the shared filesystem handles read/write access from > multiple hosts and provides UNIX file

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Earl R Shannon
Hello, Actually, there is no SAN server. The SAN is to be implemented with fiber channel devices. The imap servers will have a fiber channel interface which is connected to a fiber channel switch. Also connected to the fiber channel switches are the RAID units with the actual storage. As for the

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Ken Murchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So you think if i simply had cxfs, it would work w/o problems? I _think_ so. I've never tried it an make no guarantees. Keep in mind that CXFS is only available on IRIX and Solaris (and may require IRIX servers). SGI is supposedly working on Linux, Win32 and Mac

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Earl R Shannon wrote: > > Hello, > > We would like to use a shared filesystem. Will ALL the accounts on > each server. Then we would use a load balancing package ( Resonate ) > in front of the servers. Should one server fail the service would > continue. > > Networ

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Konrads . Smelkovs
So you think if i simply had cxfs, it would work w/o problems?

Re: undefined reference to ... on red hat 7.1

2002-03-19 Thread Ken Murchison
ronen amity wrote: > > while trying to compile cyrus imap 2.1.3 on red hat 7.1 kernal 2.4.2-2smp, > i get this error > > [amity@crow cyrus-imapd-2.1.3]# make all CFLAGS=-O > ... > gcc -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -s -Wall -g -O2 -o master > master.o masterconf.o cyrusMasterMIB.o

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-19 Thread Konrads . Smelkovs
My idea about cyrus getting sig11'ed is because of berkeley DB.

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Earl R Shannon
Hello, We would like to use a shared filesystem. Will ALL the accounts on each server. Then we would use a load balancing package ( Resonate ) in front of the servers. Should one server fail the service would continue. Network /\

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread alex
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Idea is that they share same mails/rules and acti simultaneously. A > loadbalancer will stand in front of those boxes. Its certainly something I wanted to try for a long time now. There has been many requests for this on the list, but I'm not awa

undefined reference to ... on red hat 7.1

2002-03-19 Thread ronen amity
while trying to compile cyrus imap 2.1.3 on red hat 7.1 kernal 2.4.2-2smp, i get this error [amity@crow cyrus-imapd-2.1.3]# make all CFLAGS=-O ... gcc -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -s -Wall -g -O2 -o master master.o masterconf.o cyrusMasterMIB.o -lucdagent -lucdmibs -lsnmp -lssl

Re: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-19 Thread Ken Murchison
OCNS Consulting wrote: > > David: > > I re-compiled LDAP without SASL support and re-linked pam_ldap with the new > LDAP libraries, as suggested. Restarted both LDAP and master; LDAP access > successful; > attempted IMAP access and as before Death by 11. Here's log file excerpt (SA > B4): > >

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Ken Murchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Here is the idea: > > CyrusBox1 CyrusBox2 > \ / >`-\__/ > SAN > > The questions are: > 1) Can it be done with out modifications to cyrus code? > 2) if n

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Konrads . Smelkovs
Idea is that they share same mails/rules and acti simultaneously. A loadbalancer will stand in front of those boxes. |-+-> | | Walter Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | | Sent by: | | |

Re: multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Walter Wong
--On Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:29 PM +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here is the idea: > > > > CyrusBox1 CyrusBox2 > \ / >`-\__/ > SAN > > > > The questions are: > 1) Can it be done

Freebsd 4.5 and cyrus-2.1.3

2002-03-19 Thread arc
I ran into this problem trying to build cyrus 2.1.3 on Freebsd-4.5 p2. Anybody has anybody had any better success than I ? arc@manta$ make all ### Making all in /usr/home/arc/cyrus-imapd-2.1.3/man ### Making all in /usr/home/arc/cyrus-imapd-2.1.3/sieve gcc -c -I. -I.. -I. -I./../lib -I/usr/local

multiple cyruses via SAN

2002-03-19 Thread Konrads . Smelkovs
Here is the idea: CyrusBox1 CyrusBox2 \ / `-\__/ SAN The questions are: 1) Can it be done with out modifications to cyrus code? 2) if not, what has to be done 3) perhaps someone wou

RE: Signaled to Death by 11 - Again

2002-03-19 Thread OCNS Consulting
David: I re-compiled LDAP without SASL support and re-linked pam_ldap with the new LDAP libraries, as suggested. Restarted both LDAP and master; LDAP access successful; attempted IMAP access and as before Death by 11. Here's log file excerpt (SA B4): Mar 19 10:50:11 mailsrv imapd[24376]: acce

Yet another signalled to death by 11

2002-03-19 Thread Earl R Shannon
Hello, I have a problem that may rapidly plunge me into a psychotic break. This is on Solaris 7 running cyrus imap 2.1.1. I've got the following mailer definitions in the sendmail.cf file to deliver mail to the cyrus imap mail store. ## ### Cyru

researching cyrus + ldap usage

2002-03-19 Thread Scott Russell
Greets. In the next few weeks I plan to start build a new cyrus 2.1.x imap server. Ones of the things I would like to do is use our existing corporate ldap directory for user authentication. Because it is a corporate ldap directory changing the scheme is out of the question for me. I think our l

[no subject]

2002-03-19 Thread nick
After upgrading to 2.1.2 I can't get PAM_MYSQL to work. My /etc/imapd.conf as usually says: sasl_pwcheck_method: pam and the rest is configured properly. However it doesn't work anymore. Do I have to do that via saslauthd now? If so, won't it slow down the whole thing? Log files say: Mar 18 0