Re: Debugging cyrus..?

2000-10-18 Thread Ajay Tallam
Hi Amos! Oops, I meant to reply to the list, sorry about that! * Amos Gouaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001018 15:59], about :Well, if you want to connect via the local, UNIX domain socket. The :lmtp service that's included in the Postfix snapshots doesn't :support connections via UNIX doma

Re: Compressed mailboxes

2000-10-18 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
From: "Peter S. Housel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I keep most of the mail I've received over the past four years (currently > about half a gigabyte worth) in my Cyrus mailboxes. How hard would it be to > implement a facility that moved messages that hadn't been accessed for some > period of time (a w

Compressed mailboxes

2000-10-18 Thread Peter S. Housel
I keep most of the mail I've received over the past four years (currently about half a gigabyte worth) in my Cyrus mailboxes. How hard would it be to implement a facility that moved messages that hadn't been accessed for some period of time (a week say) into a zip archive, and extract them when n

Re: Cyrus 2.0.7 death by 11 again

2000-10-18 Thread Dmitry Melekhov
"Roman A.Potvorov" wrote: > I have a Cyrus IMAP server which works fine, but in log I see the > following: > > ... > Oct 11 20:15:00 raid master[11244]: about to exec /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd > Oct 11 20:15:00 raid service-imapd[11244]: executed > Oct 11 20:15:00 raid imapd[11244]: accepted connectio

Re: NFS -- mailboxes in cyrus imap...

2000-10-18 Thread Markku Järvinen
> Yes. Cyrus requires rename() be an atomic operation. rename() is not > atomic on NFS filesystems. > > See the mailing list archives for the many times this has been discussed > to death. NFSv3 specification says that rename must be atomic on client machine, and if the NFS would only be used as