2014-09-03 17:08 GMT-04:00 Marcus Karlsson :
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:01:57PM -0400, Daniel Savard wrote:
> > I'd like to have the same information about Glade Builder in the context
> of
> > gtkmm and C++. It seems everything about Glade is either for C or Python.
> > There is a lack for good
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:01:57PM -0400, Daniel Savard wrote:
> I'd like to have the same information about Glade Builder in the context of
> gtkmm and C++. It seems everything about Glade is either for C or Python.
> There is a lack for good documentation on using Glade and gtkmm.
I don't know i
I'd like to have the same information about Glade Builder in the context of
gtkmm and C++. It seems everything about Glade is either for C or Python.
There is a lack for good documentation on using Glade and gtkmm.
-
Daniel Savard
2014-09-03 15:58 GMT-04:00 Solomon Ayomide :
> H
riginal Message-
From: Murray Cumming [mailto:murr...@murrayc.com]
Sent: vendredi 1 février 2013 11:36
To: Dos Santos, Oliveira
Cc: 'Jiergir Ogoerg'; gtkmm-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Gtkmm documentation quality
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 17:39 +0100, Dos Santos, Oliveira wrote:
>
Yes, the old versions of Gtkmm support Microsoft Windows, the new version
doesn't.
- Original Message -
From: Tilton, James C. (GSFC-6063)
Sent: 02/03/13 10:32 PM
To: Chow Loong Jin, gtkmm-list@gnome.org
Subject: RE: Gtkmm documentation quality
This is odd. I'm using gtkmm for
.nasa.gov/606.3/TILTON/ and
https://powellcenter.usgs.gov/globalcroplandwater/.
-Original Message-
From: gtkmm-list [mailto:gtkmm-list-boun...@gnome.org] On Behalf Of Chow Loong
Jin
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 9:50 PM
To: gtkmm-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Gtkmm documentation quality
On 04/02/2013 07:16, Doesnt Stop wrote:
> nice, but what version of Gtkmm are you using? are you developing in Win7/8 or
> Linux. The docs might work for one version but not for the other, since Gtkmm
> does not support Win7/8 any more.
>
> Is anyone here developing for Win7/8?
It doesn't? I wasn
/13 02:30 AM
To: Chow Loong Jin
Subject: Re: Gtkmm documentation quality
In devhelp the list of classes is complete and sorted alphabetically so you
can quickly
access the class you want, the page
http://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm/unstable/hierarchy.html
is partial, arrows not expanding
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 17:39 +0100, Dos Santos, Oliveira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently I'm writing a non-developer documentation for an EBU open project
> using GTK/GTKmm and next week I must improve the developer's documentation. I
> can add more rules in my doxygen configuration file and send it n
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 08:30 +0100, Giuseppe Penone wrote:
> In devhelp the list of classes is complete and sorted alphabetically
> so you can quickly
> access the class you want, the page
> http://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm/unstable/hierarchy.html
> is partial, arrows not expanding/collapsing (firef
In devhelp the list of classes is complete and sorted alphabetically so you
can quickly
access the class you want, the page
http://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm/unstable/hierarchy.html
is partial, arrows not expanding/collapsing (firefox), try with firefox to
search for "label" for example (ctrl+F), yo
On 31/01/2013 23:05, Giuseppe Penone wrote:
> I think that while this book is really wonderful
> http://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm-tutorial/unstable/index.html
> the online class tree http://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm/unstable/hierarchy.html
> is a disaster (while some time ago used to be good)
> and
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 11:29 +0100, Dos Santos, Oliveira wrote:
> The documentation seems to be generated with Doxygen based on the
> current CSS template of the GTKmm Class Reference. You can built a
> Doxygen configuration file in which you define how to display the
> information, which informati
I think that while this book is really wonderful
http://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm-tutorial/unstable/index.html
the online class tree
http://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm/unstable/hierarchy.html is a disaster
(while some time ago used to be good)
and I have to use the devhelp as only usable reference.
C
I would like to take this opportunity to praise the Gtkmm documentation.
As most of us did I suppose, I learned to use Gtkmm by reading the docs
-- first the tutorial book and then branching out to the reference
sections as needed. When compared to many open source projects, this
documentation
Hi,
The documentation seems to be generated with Doxygen based on the current CSS
template of the GTKmm Class Reference. You can built a Doxygen configuration
file in which you define how to display the information, which informations are
displayed or which files is used as CSS template. You s
Sorry, I had an error. Move() works by my TreeStore now
___
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
Armin Burgmeier wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 13:04 -0500, Jam wrote:
Armin Burgmeier wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:40 -0500, Jam wrote:
Hello folks,
I am using 'gtkmm-win32-devel-2.14.1-3' and after installing it I cannot
find the documentation, there is the first page onl
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 13:04 -0500, Jam wrote:
> Armin Burgmeier wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:40 -0500, Jam wrote:
> >
> > > Hello folks,
> > > I am using 'gtkmm-win32-devel-2.14.1-3' and after installing it I cannot
> > > find the documentation, there is the first page only, index.html,
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:40 -0500, Jam wrote:
> Hello folks,
> I am using 'gtkmm-win32-devel-2.14.1-3' and after installing it I cannot
> find the documentation, there is the first page only, index.html, but
> the rest of the pages are not there. I not always have access to the
> Internet, thus
I have the same issues about gtkmm.
2008/12/4 Jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello folks,
> I am using 'gtkmm-win32-devel-2.14.1-3' and after installing it I cannot
> find the documentation, there is the first page only, index.html, but the
> rest of the pages are not there. I not always have access t
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 17:53 +0100, Marko Anastasov wrote:
> I have added gtkmm-documentation to gnome-2.22.modules,
> so that it is easily buildable with jhbuild.
Thanks. However, it's aimed at svn trunk of gtkmm (because gtkmm-2-12
still has the documentation in gtkmm itself) so it might soon ha
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 13:30 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> It appears that there are some issues with the documentation on
> gtkmm.org. Some pages seem to be missing (or the links are
> incorrect?). For example:
> http://gtkmm.org/docs/gtkmm-2.4/docs/reference/html/classGlib_1_1SignalProxy0.htm
Ron Lockwood-Childs wrote:
I have another suggestion for you, if it really is the case that
documentation belongs to everyone, and that is, would someone host the
tutorial in a wiki format? This has worked quite well at my company,
and even at well-known sites such as http://wikipedia.org and
ht
24 matches
Mail list logo
