ore accessible than GUI-based tools. So I would say
that for this reason alone, these tools will continue to have an important
place.
To the extent that doclifter contributes to wider support for these valuable
legacy tools, Eric has already made a tremendous contribution.
Sincerel
nonsense. (Using the
braille equivalent of italics or quotes would be ambiguous.) In this case
tagging the literal or symbolic use of letters with the equivalent of HTML
would avoid the need for heuristics in the braille transcribing
software.
Sincerely,
Susan Jolly
>However, this markup must be added by someone.
Yes. What I meant by "fully automated" is that the application does all the
hard part of the formatting given appropriate markup added by a human. I
did not mean some sort of parser that intuits the structure.
For example, if you mark something t
You are correct that there's only so many opportunities for formatting but
there are many combinations and permutations. Think of how many different
formats are used in an old plain text man page.
In addition to centering and indenting, there are requirements for inserting
blank lines as part of
-Original Message-
From: Susan Jolly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Groff] Formatting braille
Hi Ted and Werner,
Thanks to Tend and Werner for the good questions and useful information.
>Or do
.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Susan Jolly
www.dotlessbraille.org
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
