On 4/6/25 16:22, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
At 2025-06-04T16:13:28+1000, Robert Thorsby wrote:
ImagMagick might be a good place to start. In the Good Old Days
"convert -list font" would yield something worthwhile.
Wow! I had never heard of this feature. It dutifully blasted a huge
list of fo
Hi Robert,
At 2025-06-04T16:13:28+1000, Robert Thorsby wrote:
> ImagMagick might be a good place to start. In the Good Old Days
> "convert -list font" would yield something worthwhile.
Wow! I had never heard of this feature. It dutifully blasted a huge
list of fonts to my terminal window. Appa
On 4/6/25 15:47, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
At 2025-06-02T22:25:12+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
An indication where to find code that installs fonts should be added
to the PROBLEMS file.
See bug #58831 and bug #60930.
This doesn't really have anything in particular to do with mo
At 2025-06-02T22:25:12+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> An indication where to find code that installs fonts should be added
> to the PROBLEMS file.
>
> See bug #58831 and bug #60930.
This doesn't really have anything in particular to do with mom, except
insofar as, perhaps, mom's users
[self-follow-up to clarify]
At 2025-06-03T22:08:31-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I think it's probably better to query the terminal (or the terminal
> information database) to find out about its support for colors.
>
> That in turn would depend on the much-delayed Savannah #63583.
>
> https
Hi Ingo,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 02:49:16PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm not sure i'm up to date with this discussion, hence i trimmed the
> other mailing lists.
I had fogotten some parts we had discussed too. Thanks for reminding
some.
> I think i uttered my doubts that .SY wi
Hello,
i'm not sure i'm up to date with this discussion, hence i trimmed the
other mailing lists.
I think i uttered my doubts that .SY will ever fly in the past.
When an overly simplistic approach to a task of considerable
complexity is introduced without fully considering the requirements
of the
Hi Branden,
On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 04:11:21PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Thanks for giving it some field testing. groff's own man pages aren't
> > the best test bed because I've revised nearly all of them so extensively
> > that they don't do things I wouldn't anticipate.
> >
> > > -
