At 2018-12-10T23:24:50+0100, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
> Hi Brandent,
>
> On Sun, Dec 09 2018 at 06:50:32 PM, "G. Branden Robinson"
> wrote:
> > At 2018-12-10T00:43:39+0100, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
> [...]
> >> hmm... the patch does not apply for me (I'm on master
> >> 92f40b186aa2adda8039fff0
Hi Brandent,
On Sun, Dec 09 2018 at 06:50:32 PM, "G. Branden Robinson"
wrote:
> At 2018-12-10T00:43:39+0100, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
[...]
>> hmm... the patch does not apply for me (I'm on master
>> 92f40b186aa2adda8039fff09c1246bdd30dbd3d).
>
> It follows 3 of the other patches I have pending
Hi Ingo,
On Mon, Dec 10 2018 at 01:58:56 AM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
[...]
> My first impulse was to say "presumably, at some time in the (possibly
> remote) past, systems existed where libm provided a viable implementation
> of hypot(), but failed to declare it. Your propsed direction
> might bre
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Dec 09 2018 at 02:32:00 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Ralph Corderoy wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 10:36:25AM +:
>> The time-honoured way to achieve this is using the built-in `set'.
>>
>> $ l='foo bar xyzzy'
>> $ set -- $l; for f; do echo f=$f; done | fmt
>> f=foo
Hi Peter,
thanks for fixing that.
Actually, how that error got introduced is quite interesting.
The erroneous attribution was added in commit 1a0ea2d7
on Sep 20 00:35:44 2014 +0200 with this commit message:
all man-pages in groff source tree: use \[aq], \[oq], \[cq], \[co]
and this ChangeLog
> Bash is a complex program, and the length of the manpage is
> entirely adequate.
It's adequate in the sense of being quite complete and accurate. It's
also verbose. The introductory paragraph is laudably crisp. But right
after that comes
-cIf the -c option is present, then commands are
Ingo Schwarze wrote in <20181209133200.gc7...@athene.usta.de>:
..
|Ralph Corderoy wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 10:36:25AM +:
..
|> The time-honoured way to achieve this is using the built-in `set'.
|>
|> $ l='foo bar xyzzy'
|> $ set -- $l; for f; do echo f=$f; done | fmt
|>
On 12/7/18, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> What the user finds on the Web may not even correspond to the version
> of the software that is actually installed.
Lilypond addresses this by keeping documentation for all past released
versions on the web, with the version number as part of the URL.
Whatever v
Hi Bjarni,
> > > > . pso sh -c \
> > > > "printf '%s' '.ds *f ' ; \
> > > > ls \\*[fontpath]/dev\*[.T] \
> > > > -| tr '[:cntrl:]' '[ *32]'"
> > > > +| tr 'n' ' '"
> > > > . \" This dummy line is necessary; the preceding line eats it.
...
> cd \\*[fontpa
