Re: [Groff] text variants

Werner LEMBERG wrote: |> I wonder what those "+" markers are for, they have been added in |> [48615a4]. | |Uh, oh, a lot of them are lost :-( As documented in the man page, they |indicate that the (two-letter) glyph name is documented in the |original troff manual. It seems i have searched

Re: [Groff] eqn converts "lambda" to "&lamda;"

Hi Ted, Ted Harding wrote on Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:01:54PM -: > You have replied to a message from Brian McGuinness, 13/12/2015. > I do not seem to have received such a message myself, nor can > I find it in the groff archive (though your reply is there). > Maybe it was a personal message t

Re: [Groff] eqn converts "lambda" to "&lamda;"

Hi Ingo, You have replied to a message from Brian McGuinness, 13/12/2015. I do not seem to have received such a message myself, nor can I find it in the groff archive (though your reply is there). Maybe it was a personal message to you from Brian, and you copied your reply to the groff list. If so

Re: [Groff] eqn converts "lambda" to "&lamda;"

Thanks, Ingo. All understood now! Ted. On 15-Dec-2015 17:11:12 Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Ted Harding wrote on Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:01:54PM -: > >> You have replied to a message from Brian McGuinness, 13/12/2015. >> I do not seem to have received such a message myself, nor can >> I

Re: [Groff] text variants

> I wonder what those "+" markers are for, they have been added in > [48615a4]. Uh, oh, a lot of them are lost :-( As documented in the man page, they indicate that the (two-letter) glyph name is documented in the original troff manual. I fear that Bernd won't be able to fix this due to personal

Re: [Groff] text variants

Werner LEMBERG wrote: |Please restore the markers. I think this should be it regarding ***. --steffen diff --git a/man/groff_char.man b/man/groff_char.man index f393578..edd3792 100644 --- a/man/groff_char.man +++ b/man/groff_char.man @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ right angle bracket T} \[bv] \e[bv]

Re: [Groff] text variants

Hello. Werner LEMBERG wrote: |> It seems more likely, though, that these markers were erroneously |> removed during the rather extensive changes introduced in this |> commit -- surely the point about the font metrics for these glyphs |> remains true. Bernd? | |Please restore the markers.

Re: [Groff] text variants

Dave Kemper wrote: |On 11/23/15, Dave Kemper wrote: |> groff_char does seem to address this issue regarding other glyphs. It |> says, "Entries marked with `***' denote glyphs for mathematical |I was finally going to do this but hit a snag: it turns out commit |07a6233adeb476611f7a286295935

Re: [Groff] eqn converts "lambda" to "&lamda;"

Hi Brian, McGuinness, Brian wrote on Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 07:15:21PM -0500: > I was experimenting with eqn because I think it > will prove very useful for generating MathML > code easily. Groff is certainly a good choice for processing eqn(1) input, in particular when aiming for typeset output,

Re: [Groff] Add a history link to roff(7)

> The page "History of UNIX Manpages" > http://manpages.bsd.lv/history.html is more comprehensive than > troff.org, contains links to the old material and correspondence > with the actual authors. Patch now applied, thanks! Werner

Re: [Groff] text variants

> It seems more likely, though, that these markers were erroneously > removed during the rather extensive changes introduced in this > commit -- surely the point about the font metrics for these glyphs > remains true. Bernd? Please restore the markers. Werner