Re: [Groff] groff ms: Is there an order to setting PS and VS

2015-03-17 Thread Doug McIlroy
> If I set ?registers PO and LL and also set PS and VS, the values of > PO and LL seem to revert to the default values. As you expected, the order of setting doesn't matter. I don't see anything strange in the run below. where the stderr output follows the closing '!'. groff -ms <<'!' >/dev/nu

Re: [Groff] groff ms: Is there an order to setting PS and VS versus PO and LL

2015-03-17 Thread Ted Harding
On 17-Mar-2015 18:00:47 Heinz-Jürgen Oertel wrote: > Am Dienstag, 17. März 2015, 15:34:59 schrieb Dorai Sitaram: >> If I set registers PO and LL and also set PS and VS, the values of PO and >> LL seem to revert to the default values. It doesn't seem to matter which >> order I set these registers i

Re: [Groff] groff ms: Is there an order to setting PS and VS versus PO and LL

2015-03-17 Thread Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
Am Dienstag, 17. März 2015, 15:34:59 schrieb Dorai Sitaram: > If I set registers PO and LL and also set PS and VS, the values of PO and LL > seem to revert to the default values. It doesn't seem to matter which order I > set these registers in (all done in the preamble of the document of course)

[Groff] groff ms: Is there an order to setting PS and VS versus PO and LL

2015-03-17 Thread Dorai Sitaram
If I set  registers PO and LL and also set PS and VS, the values of PO and LL seem to revert to the default values. It doesn't seem to matter which order I set these registers in (all done in the preamble of the document of course).   What is a way to make all settings of these four registers sti