"brian m. carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my experience that this is common with combining diacritic marks in
> most TrueType fonts. In other words, this bug is not specific to
> Heirloom troff, but instead probably a problem with the fonts.
No, this was not the problem here. Both o
Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shows that the "hat" is sort of right aligned above the K,
> not centered as the dot is in the ps output. moreover the
> vertical distance above the K seems different for both marks
> (probably they both are "top aligned" in this direction?).
T
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:27:22PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
what I really would think wrong behaviour is seen with
diacritical marks:
something like
.EQ
lpile {
K hat = y
above
K dot = x
}
.EN
shows that the "hat" is sort of right aligned above the K,
not centered as the dot
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 04:02:37PM +0100, Gunnar Ritter wrote:
> "Michael Kerpan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After joining this board (and being mostly a lurker), I've been clued
> > in to the awesome -mom macro package. I'd like to use it with my
> > extensive collection of OTF fonts, but i
> >> Are there any plans to add "modern" font handling and format
> >> support a la "htroff" to groff
> >
> > No, unfortunately.
>
> Gurus, may you explain to mere mortals what are you talking about?
> What is that modern font handling in htroff?
>
> Does it imply easier (run-time) obtaining basic
Dear Werner and All,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Are there any plans to add "modern" font handling and format support
a la "htroff" to groff
No, unfortunately.
Gurus, may you explain to mere mortals what are you talking about?
What is that modern font handling in htroff?
Does
