Re: [Gossip] next anti-spambot steps

2003-02-21 Thread Earl Hood
On February 21, 2003 at 10:43, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > BTW ASPseek does (and internally stores all data in UTF-8, so it's not a > problem to have many different encodings in one DB, including even CJK > ideographs). > > I suspect* if you will correctly specify charset (by having, say > > > ...

Re: [Gossip] next anti-spambot steps

2003-02-20 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Earl Hood wrote: On February 20, 2003 at 11:58, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: It's a constant battle against the spambots. We do a lot of anti-spambot stuff already, but there are a lot of spam miscreants out there. Now that MHonArc 2.6 is out I will probably switch to (succumb to?) completely censor

Re: [Gossip] next anti-spambot steps

2003-02-20 Thread Earl Hood
On February 20, 2003 at 11:58, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > It's a constant battle against the spambots. We do a lot of > anti-spambot stuff already, but there are a lot of spam miscreants out > there. Now that MHonArc 2.6 is out I will probably switch to (succumb > to?) completely censoring the emai

[Gossip] next anti-spambot steps

2003-02-20 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Hi all, It's a constant battle against the spambots. We do a lot of anti-spambot stuff already, but there are a lot of spam miscreants out there. Now that MHonArc 2.6 is out I will probably switch to (succumb to?) completely censoring the email addresses appearing in message bodies, i.e. replace