I'd like to revisit the "Three Questions" at a slightly higher level.
One of the questions was about privacy. Mail-Archive is fundamentally
about public, not private information. In general, if it is private,
one should not send it to Mail-Archive. For example, email addresses
on message bodies a
On Thursday 30 October 2003 00:22, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> I would be much happier if the list administrator is the one who
> initiates the archival process for three reasons. First, forwarding
> (also known as tunneling) a list can cause technical problems with
> Mail-Archive's sorting engine. S
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 21:34, Earl Hood wrote:
> > Since the vast majority of these types of statements are being prepared
> > withi n
> > few days of the issueing of the original statement, a 3000 messages
> > window is
> >
> > just fine. If it isn't, that's tough luck...
>
> But, ignoring j
Looks like Earl beat me to many of the same answers. Mail-Archive
decisions and policies are made using my own (hopefully good)
judgement and my understanding of applicable US law.
-Jeff
___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mail-archiv
>Question the first: How does mail-archive.org act when a reply to one
>mail is sent very much later, say one to five years? The message will
>be a reply to the original message, with In-Reply-To headers and
>everything else set correctly, and will be part of the mailing-list
>that mail-archive.or
On October 29, 2003 at 21:55, Kristian =?iso-8859-15?q?K=F6hntopp?= wrote:
> > And, IMHO, the German law you refer to should not have been
> > passed.
>
> I understand from a previous discussion on SlashDot that the concepts behind
> this particular law are very foreign to people in the US.
I
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 20:04, Earl Hood wrote:
> As for the German law, it has no jurisdiction with the U.S., where
> mail-archive is located.
That is one particular reason why I chose mail-archive.org as a destination
site for the mailing list as opposed to any site within the same juris
(Note, I do not run mail-archive.com, but I familiar with some its
software)
On October 29, 2003 at 19:03, Kristian =?iso-8859-15?q?K=F6hntopp?= wrote:
> Question the first: How does mail-archive.org act when a reply to one
> mail is
> sent very much later, say one to five years? The message w
Question the first: How does mail-archive.org act when a reply to one mail is
sent very much later, say one to five years? The message will be a reply to
the original message, with In-Reply-To headers and everything else set
correctly, and will be part of the mailing-list that mail-archive.org i
