Everything looks great!!! Thanks, guys.
--
Louis Proyect, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/12/2001
Marxism list: http://www.marxmail.org
___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
>> I downgraded backed to mhonarc 2.4.9 to see if it would help with
>> performance problems.
>
>>Was there a difference?
I think so, although there were a lot of other things making the
determination unclear. For starters: A near full filesystem, a runaway
process consuming one of the CPU's, co
On November 10, 2001 at 00:04, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> >Version v2.5 avoids this problem since HEADER and FOOTER resources
> >are no longer supported.
>
> I downgraded backed to mhonarc 2.4.9 to see if it would help with
> performance problems.
Was there a difference?
> In fact, the time seq
Earl, I am not sure what you mean by being at a loss. Perhaps I did not
express myself clearly enough. This is not exactly a 'footer' problem in
the technical sense of mhonarc parameters, I don't think. Instead it is a
problem that I and others have run into. Basically, an index page (in this
case
On November 10, 2001 at 11:38, Louis N Proyect wrote:
> Earl, I am not sure what you mean by being at a loss. Perhaps I did not
> express myself clearly enough. This is not exactly a 'footer' problem in
At a certain level, it is, even if you did not use HEADER and FOOTER
since MHonArc processed
Thanks, Earl. I only hope the guys at mail-archive.com (hiya!) can put 2.5
back in as soon as they straighten out some of the performance issues. I
guess my other question is what would be the simplest way to re-build the
date index after they do that (taking notes, fellows?).
On Sat, 10 Nov 200
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Earl Hood wrote:
> You can regen the index file by doing something like the following:
>
> mhonarc -editidx -nomsgpgs ...
>
I guess this answers the question in my last post.
___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
>Version v2.5 avoids this problem since HEADER and FOOTER resources
>are no longer supported.
I downgraded backed to mhonarc 2.4.9 to see if it would help with
performance problems.
In fact, the time sequence went like this:
1) 2.4.9 + 2.5.0 config
2) 2.4.9 + 2.5.0 config
3) 2.5.0 + 2
On November 9, 2001 at 16:03, Louis Proyect wrote:
> I just discovered that the Marxism list archives date index are suffering
> from a long-standing bug in Mhonarc. This manifests itself as a kind of
> "loop" in which a huge index page gets created. Footer information appears
> propagated at all
