Thanks, Earl. I only hope the guys at mail-archive.com (hiya!) can put 2.5 back in as soon as they straighten out some of the performance issues. I guess my other question is what would be the simplest way to re-build the date index after they do that (taking notes, fellows?).
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Earl Hood wrote: > On November 10, 2001 at 11:38, Louis N Proyect wrote: > > > Earl, I am not sure what you mean by being at a loss. Perhaps I did not > > express myself clearly enough. This is not exactly a 'footer' problem in > > At a certain level, it is, even if you did not use HEADER and FOOTER > since MHonArc processed the main index as if there is always could be a > header and/or footer. I.e. It edits the main index instead of > rewriting as is done with the thread index. Notice how the problem you > see never occurs with thread indexes? > > In v2.5, MHonArc completely rewrites a main index page. > > I never figured out a case in earlier releases that could replicate > the "growing index" problem everytime, so it made it hard to > figure out what may be the culprit. My hunch is it is something > with perl I/O. It is like the file handle does not get completely > flushed when the file is closed. > > --ewh > _______________________________________________ Gossip mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
